Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2017
The utility of CT and MRI in detecting male urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Jung Jae, Park Byung Kwan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting male urethral recurrence (UR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2008 and March 2016, 12 men (age range 61-85 years; median, 74 years) with urethral bloody discharge or pain were histologically confirmed as UR after radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma. Of these patients, eight underwent both CT and MRI. The remaining four patients underwent CT only. CT and MRI were compared regarding UR detection rate. CT and MRI were also evaluated to determine which modality was more accurate for depicting UR. UR detection rate of each MRI sequence were recorded. Standard reference was biopsy or urethrectomy in 11 patients and size change in one patient after treatment.
RESULTS: UR detection rate with CT was 41.7% (5/12), while that with MRI was 100% (8/8) (p = 0.0147). Of the eight patients who were diagnosed UR with MRI, six were detected with MRI alone and two with both MRI and CT (p = 0.0313). UR detection rates of T2-weighted, T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced MRI were 87.5% (7/8), 62.5% (5/8), 100% (5/5), and 87.5% (7/8), respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to CT in detecting male URs in symptomatic patients after radical cystectomy. T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced MRI sequences are useful for detecting male UR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2008 and March 2016, 12 men (age range 61-85 years; median, 74 years) with urethral bloody discharge or pain were histologically confirmed as UR after radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma. Of these patients, eight underwent both CT and MRI. The remaining four patients underwent CT only. CT and MRI were compared regarding UR detection rate. CT and MRI were also evaluated to determine which modality was more accurate for depicting UR. UR detection rate of each MRI sequence were recorded. Standard reference was biopsy or urethrectomy in 11 patients and size change in one patient after treatment.
RESULTS: UR detection rate with CT was 41.7% (5/12), while that with MRI was 100% (8/8) (p = 0.0147). Of the eight patients who were diagnosed UR with MRI, six were detected with MRI alone and two with both MRI and CT (p = 0.0313). UR detection rates of T2-weighted, T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced MRI were 87.5% (7/8), 62.5% (5/8), 100% (5/5), and 87.5% (7/8), respectively.
CONCLUSION: MRI is superior to CT in detecting male URs in symptomatic patients after radical cystectomy. T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and contrast-enhanced MRI sequences are useful for detecting male UR.