American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2012
Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Friedman Alexander M, Srinivas Sindhu K, Parry Samuel, Elovitz Michal A, Wang Eileen, Schwartz Nadav
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Universal transvaginal cervical length screening can be associated with a significant logistical burden. We hypothesized that there is a threshold cervical length measured by transabdominal ultrasound above which risk for short transvaginal cervical length is extremely low.
STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study evaluated a consecutive series of women offered universal transvaginal cervical length screening during anatomy ultrasound. Transabdominal measurement of the cervix-obtained before and after voiding for each patient-was performed before transvaginal ultrasound. The study was powered to detect a transabdominal cervical length cutoff with 95% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 90-99%) for transvaginal cervical length of ≤25 mm.
RESULTS: One thousand two hundred seventeen women were included in the analysis. Prevoid transabdominal cervical length ≤36 mm detects 96% of transvaginal cervical lengths ≤25 mm with 39% specificity. A prevoid transabdominal cervical length ≤35 mm detects 100% of transvaginal cervical lengths ≤20 mm with 41% specificity. Transabdominal images of the cervix could not be obtained in 6.2% of women prevoid and 17.9% of women postvoid.
CONCLUSION: Transabdominal cervical length screening successfully identifies women at very low risk for short transvaginal cervical length. Transabdominal screening may significantly reduce the burden of universal cervical length screening by allowing approximately 40% of women to avoid transvaginal ultrasound. To ensure high sensitivity of transabdominal screening, approximately 60% of patients will still require a transvaginal study.
STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study evaluated a consecutive series of women offered universal transvaginal cervical length screening during anatomy ultrasound. Transabdominal measurement of the cervix-obtained before and after voiding for each patient-was performed before transvaginal ultrasound. The study was powered to detect a transabdominal cervical length cutoff with 95% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 90-99%) for transvaginal cervical length of ≤25 mm.
RESULTS: One thousand two hundred seventeen women were included in the analysis. Prevoid transabdominal cervical length ≤36 mm detects 96% of transvaginal cervical lengths ≤25 mm with 39% specificity. A prevoid transabdominal cervical length ≤35 mm detects 100% of transvaginal cervical lengths ≤20 mm with 41% specificity. Transabdominal images of the cervix could not be obtained in 6.2% of women prevoid and 17.9% of women postvoid.
CONCLUSION: Transabdominal cervical length screening successfully identifies women at very low risk for short transvaginal cervical length. Transabdominal screening may significantly reduce the burden of universal cervical length screening by allowing approximately 40% of women to avoid transvaginal ultrasound. To ensure high sensitivity of transabdominal screening, approximately 60% of patients will still require a transvaginal study.