Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2013
Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hernandez-Andrade E, Hassan S S, Ahn H, Korzeniewski S J, Yeo L, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical stiffness during pregnancy using ultrasound-derived elastography, a method used to estimate the average tissue displacement (strain) within a defined region of interest when oscillatory compression is applied.
METHODS: Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid-sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross-sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within-subject correlation. Inter-rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients.
RESULTS: A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8-40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross-sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross-sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of > 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age.
CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.
METHODS: Strain was calculated in two regions of interest, the endocervical canal and the entire cervix, from three anatomical planes of the cervix: mid-sagittal in the plane used for cervical length measurement and in cross-sectional planes located at the internal and external cervical os. Associations between strain values, method of ascertainment and patient characteristics were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within-subject correlation. Inter-rater agreement in defining the degree of cervical stiffness was evaluated in 120 regions of interest acquired by two operators in 20 patients.
RESULTS: A total of 1557 strain estimations were performed in 262 patients at 8-40 weeks of gestation. Adjusting for other sources of variation, (1) cervical tissue strain estimates obtained in the endocervical canal were on average 33% greater than those obtained in the entire cervix; (2) measurements obtained in the cross-sectional plane of the external cervical os and sagittal plane were 45% and 13% greater than those measured in the cross-sectional plane of the internal cervical os, respectively; (3) mean strain rates were 14% and 5% greater among parous women with and without a history of preterm delivery compared with those of nulliparous women, respectively, and were on average 13% greater among women with a cervical length of between 25 and 30 mm compared to those with a cervical length of > 30 mm; and (4) cervical tissue strain was more strongly associated with cervical length than with gestational age.
CONCLUSION: Semiquantitative elastography can be employed to evaluate changes in cervical stiffness during pregnancy.