Medicine · 2023
Mesothelial cyst of uterus in a nullipara patient: A case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ren Xiu-Cong, Liu Wei, Hu Li-Rong, Mao Min
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Uterine mesothelial cysts represent a diagnostic challenge because of their low incidence, with very few cases reported in the English literature.
PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 27-year-old nullipara woman complaining of self-discovery of a mass in the abdomen for 1 week. Supersonic examination revealed a pelvic cystic lesion measuring 8.9 × 8.2 cm. The patient underwent exploratory single-port laparoscopic surgery and had a large uterine cystic mass located within the posterior wall of the uterus.
DIAGNOSIS: After excision of the uterine cyst, the final histopathological diagnosis was uterine mesothelial cyst.
INTERVENTIONS: We treated her with a single-port laparoscopic uterine cystectomy.
OUTCOMES: Close follow-up of the case for 2 years showed that the patient was free of any symptoms, and no recurrence was noted.
LESSONS: Uterine mesothelial cysts are extremely rare. They are often misdiagnosed by clinicians as extrauterine masses or cystic degeneration of leiomyomas. This report aims to share a rare case of uterine mesothelial cyst and improve gynecologists' academic vision of the disease.
PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 27-year-old nullipara woman complaining of self-discovery of a mass in the abdomen for 1 week. Supersonic examination revealed a pelvic cystic lesion measuring 8.9 × 8.2 cm. The patient underwent exploratory single-port laparoscopic surgery and had a large uterine cystic mass located within the posterior wall of the uterus.
DIAGNOSIS: After excision of the uterine cyst, the final histopathological diagnosis was uterine mesothelial cyst.
INTERVENTIONS: We treated her with a single-port laparoscopic uterine cystectomy.
OUTCOMES: Close follow-up of the case for 2 years showed that the patient was free of any symptoms, and no recurrence was noted.
LESSONS: Uterine mesothelial cysts are extremely rare. They are often misdiagnosed by clinicians as extrauterine masses or cystic degeneration of leiomyomas. This report aims to share a rare case of uterine mesothelial cyst and improve gynecologists' academic vision of the disease.