Frontiers in oncology · 2025
Outcomes of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Yu-Chun, Shi Yin-Hao, Li Xiao-Feng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection is the only curative option. Extended lymphadenectomy (EPD) during pancreatoduodenectomy may improve staging and reduce recurrence, but its survival benefits over standard lymphadenectomy (SPD) remain controversial.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on March 25, 2025. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were subjected to quality assessment and subsequently analyzed by meta-analytical methods.
RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 1382 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between EPD and SPD in OS (HR = 1.09, p = 0.384), DFS (HR = 1.08, p = 0.506), or recurrence (78.05% vs. 79.64%, p = 0.295). EPD retrieved more positive lymph nodes (MD = 0.66, p = 0.008), but did not improve prognosis. Postoperative morbidity (38.49% vs. 33.27%, p = 0.072), mortality (1.97% vs. 1.33%, p = 0.589), transfusion volume (MD = -31.27, p = 0.469), and hospital stay (MD = -0.15, p = 0.917) were comparable, though EPD increased operative time (MD = 53.24, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: EPD reduces lymph node recurrence without improving OS or DFS, suggesting limited prognostic benefit. Its application in pancreatic cancer should be carefully considered.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024594566.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on March 25, 2025. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were subjected to quality assessment and subsequently analyzed by meta-analytical methods.
RESULTS: Nine RCTs involving 1382 patients were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between EPD and SPD in OS (HR = 1.09, p = 0.384), DFS (HR = 1.08, p = 0.506), or recurrence (78.05% vs. 79.64%, p = 0.295). EPD retrieved more positive lymph nodes (MD = 0.66, p = 0.008), but did not improve prognosis. Postoperative morbidity (38.49% vs. 33.27%, p = 0.072), mortality (1.97% vs. 1.33%, p = 0.589), transfusion volume (MD = -31.27, p = 0.469), and hospital stay (MD = -0.15, p = 0.917) were comparable, though EPD increased operative time (MD = 53.24, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: EPD reduces lymph node recurrence without improving OS or DFS, suggesting limited prognostic benefit. Its application in pancreatic cancer should be carefully considered.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024594566.