Transplantation proceedings · 2017
Comparison of Surgical Correction Techniques for Post-Renal Transplantation Vesicoureteral Reflux.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turunç V, Eroğlu A, Tabandeh B, Erol A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) after renal transplantation (RT) is an important morbidity in transplant recipients and may cause pyelonephritis and sepsis. Surgical correction of high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after RT is suggested, performing ureteral reimplantation or pyelo-ureteral/uretero-ureteral anastomosis. Recently, extravesical seromuscular tunnel lengthening techniques have been reported with favorable results and low complication rates.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 38 patients with post-transplantation VUR who underwent reflux correction surgery. Patient characteristics were analyzed to compare our extravesical seromuscular tunnel lengthening technique with uretero-ureteral and pyelo-ureteral anastomosis techniques.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with the extravesical approach (group I) and 18 patients by pyelo-ureteral or uretero-ureteral anastomosis with the use of native ureter (group II). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in group I than in group II (64.8 vs 110.1 min; P < .05), and mean duration of hospital stay after the operation also was shorter in group I (1.5 vs 5.1 d; P < .05). We determined persistent VUR in postoperative voiding cystouretrography in 2 patients (10%) in group I, but there was regression in VUR grades of all of the patients. There was no significant difference in postoperative number of UTI episodes and serum creatinine levels between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Extravesical seromuscular tunnel lengthening is an effective and safe technique for post-transplantation VUR management.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 38 patients with post-transplantation VUR who underwent reflux correction surgery. Patient characteristics were analyzed to compare our extravesical seromuscular tunnel lengthening technique with uretero-ureteral and pyelo-ureteral anastomosis techniques.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with the extravesical approach (group I) and 18 patients by pyelo-ureteral or uretero-ureteral anastomosis with the use of native ureter (group II). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in group I than in group II (64.8 vs 110.1 min; P < .05), and mean duration of hospital stay after the operation also was shorter in group I (1.5 vs 5.1 d; P < .05). We determined persistent VUR in postoperative voiding cystouretrography in 2 patients (10%) in group I, but there was regression in VUR grades of all of the patients. There was no significant difference in postoperative number of UTI episodes and serum creatinine levels between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Extravesical seromuscular tunnel lengthening is an effective and safe technique for post-transplantation VUR management.