MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000448339

Медицинская библиотека · Urologia internationalis · 2016

Incidence, Risk Factors and a Novel Prevention Technique for Inguinal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Shimbo Masaki, Endo Fumiyasu, Matsushita Kazuhito, Iwabuchi Toshihisa, Fujisaki Akiko, Kyono Yoko, Hishiki Kohsuke, Muraishi Osamu, Hattori Kazunori

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for postoperative inguinal hernia (IH) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to assess whether a newly developed prevention technique reduces the incidence of IH after RARP.

METHODS

We included 161 consecutive patients (322 groins) who underwent RARP between September 2011 and October 2013. The prevention technique was as follows: (1) sufficient incision of peritoneum around the internal inguinal ring; (2) separation of spermatic vessels; (3) dissection of vas deferens.

RESULTS

Postoperative IH occurred in 14 cases (19.4%) occurring in the observation group compared to 2 cases (2.2%) in the prevention group. Patent processus vaginalis (PPV) was the only risk factor. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in IH incidence in the IH prevention group (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our data reveal a higher incidence of IH after RARP, with the existence of PPV as the only identified risk factor. Our simple IH-prevention technique, which does not involve the use of artificial materials, appears safe and effective.

Для цитирования: Shimbo Masaki, Endo Fumiyasu, Matsushita Kazuhito, Iwabuchi Toshihisa, Fujisaki Akiko, Kyono Yoko, Hishiki Kohsuke, Muraishi Osamu, Hattori Kazunori. Incidence, Risk Factors and a Novel Prevention Technique for Inguinal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.. Urologia internationalis. 2016. DOI: 10.1159/000448339.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.