MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · La Medicina del lavoro · 2016

Renal cell carcinoma and malignant peritoneal mesothelioma after occupational asbestos exposure: case report.

Candura Stefano Massimo, Boeri Riccardo, Teragni Cristina, Chen Yao, Scafa Fabrizio

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Asbestos is the main causal factor for malignant mesothelioma (MM), a relatively rare and aggressive malignancy. Some epidemiological evidence suggests a role of this agent also in the etiology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most common form of kidney cancer.

CASE REPORT: After 7 years of asbestos exposure, a 76-year-old asbestos-cement worker came to our notice with left flank pain. Diagnostic imaging disclosed a neoplasm in the upper two thirds of the left kidney, without evidence of metastases. After surgery (nephrectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy), histopathology revealed clear cell RCC. One year later, the patient was hospitalized for abdominal pain. Laparoscopy showed diffuse neoplastic infiltration of the peritoneum and liver. Histological and immunohistochemical examination of the bioptic samples led to the diagnosis of biphasic MM. The subject died 2 months later. Autopsy disclosed ascites and diffuse infiltration of the abdominal wall and viscera, without evidence of RCC relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the second reported case of association between RCC and peritoneal MM in the scientific literature. Asbestos might be involved in the causation of both malignancies.

Для цитирования: Candura Stefano Massimo, Boeri Riccardo, Teragni Cristina, Chen Yao, Scafa Fabrizio. Renal cell carcinoma and malignant peritoneal mesothelioma after occupational asbestos exposure: case report.. La Medicina del lavoro. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.