MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf00389497

Медицинская библиотека · Acta neuropathologica · 1994

Pleomorphic pineocytoma with extensive neuronal differentiation: report of two cases.

Kuchelmeister K, von Borcke I M, Klein H, Bergmann M, Gullotta F

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Two pineal parenchymal tumors are presented, arising in a 54-year-old man and a 72-year-old woman; respectively. They showed isomorphic, cellular areas of small cells, often with characteristic pineocytomatous rosettes, and of medium-sized cells, as well as less cellular regions with highly pleomorphic, often ganglioid large cells. Immunohistochemistry disclosed extensive neuronal differentiation. There was intense positivity for neurofilament protein and microtubule-associated protein 2 in the pleomorphic areas and more variable expression in the isomorphic regions. Diffuse synaptophysin positivity was seen, accentuated along the borders of pleomorphic cells and in the rosettes, as well as diffuse interstitial and/or cytoplasmic expression of neuron-specific enolase, PGP 9.5 and tau. beta-Tubulin III was detected in most cells and slight positivity was found in the rosettes. Expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein, however, was restricted to resident astrocytes and an interstitial network of processes. These neuronally differentiated pleomorphic pineocytomas underline the broad histomorphological spectrum of pineal parenchymal tumors.

Для цитирования: Kuchelmeister K, von Borcke I M, Klein H, Bergmann M, Gullotta F. Pleomorphic pineocytoma with extensive neuronal differentiation: report of two cases.. Acta neuropathologica. 1994. DOI: 10.1007/bf00389497.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.