MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1526602817711424

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2017

Outcomes After Endovascular Revascularization in Octogenarians and Non-Octogenarians With Critical Limb Ischemia.

Uhl Christian, Steinbauer Markus, Torsello Giovanni, Bisdas Theodosios, The CRITISCH collaborators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome and periprocedural risk of endovascular revascularization in octogenarians with critical limb ischemia (CLI) compared with their younger counterparts.

METHODS

The multicenter, prospective registry for First-line Treatments in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (CRITISCH) enrolled 642 patients treated with endovascular techniques ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01877252). The patients were dichotomized according to age <80 years (n=421; mean age 69 years, 292 men; group 1) or ≥80 years (n=221; mean age 85 years, 113 men; group 2). The groups had similar distributions in Rutherford categories 4 to 6, but group 1 had more men, smokers, diabetics, and patients on dialysis. The primary composite endpoint of the study was amputation and/or death. Key secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and major amputation, as well as major adverse limb events (MALE; any reintervention or major amputation involving the index limb) at 1 year.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality was 1% in group 1 and 2% in group 2 (p=0.204) and the major amputation rates were 4% and 2% (p=0.169), respectively. Amputation-free survival at 1 year was 75% in group 1 and 77% in group 2 (p=0.340), whereas freedom from MALE was significantly different between the groups [62% group 1 vs 72% group 2; hazard ratio (HR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to 1.93, p=0.016). Limb salvage was 90% in group 1 and 95% in group 2 (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.69, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians with CLI treated by endovascular means showed comparable early and 1-year amputation-free survival rates vs their younger counterparts, and limb salvage and freedom from MALE rates were even higher in octogenarians.

APPENDIX: The CRITISCH collaborators are Farzin Adili, MD (Darmstadt), Kai Balzer, MD (Bonn), Arend Billing, MD (Offenbach), Dittmar Böckler, MD (Heidelberg), Daniel Brixner, MD (Offenbach), Sebastian E. Debus, MD (Hamburg), Hans-Henning Eckstein, MD (München), Hans-Joachim Florek, MD (Freital), Asimakis Gkremoutis, MD (Frankfurt), Reinhardt Grundmann, MD (Bad Krozingen), Thomas Hupp, MD (Stuttgart), Se-Won Hwang, MD (Muenster), Tobias Keck, MD (Lübeck), Wojciech, Klonek, MD (Cloppenburg), Werner Lang, MD (Erlangen), Björn May (Freital), Alexander Meyer, MD (Erlangen), Bernhard Mühling, MD (Biberach), Alexander Oberhuber, MD (Düsseldorf), Holger Reinecke, MD (Münster), Christian Reinhold, MD (Mönchengladbach), Ralf-Gerhard Ritter, MD (Bielefeld), Hubert Schelzig, MD (Düsseldorf), Christian Schlensack, MD (Tübingen), Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, MD (Frankfurt), Karl-Ludwig Schulte, MD (Berlin), Matthias Spohn, MD (Bamberg), Konstantinos Stavroulakis, MD (Münster), Martin Storck, MD (Karlsruhe), Matthias Trede, MD (Bremen), Barbara Weis-Müller, MD (Mönchengladbach), Heiner Wenk (Bremen), Thomas Zeller, MD (Bad Krozingen), Sven Zhorzel, MD (Munich), and Alexander Zimmermann, MD (Munich).

Для цитирования: Uhl Christian, Steinbauer Markus, Torsello Giovanni, Bisdas Theodosios, The CRITISCH collaborators. Outcomes After Endovascular Revascularization in Octogenarians and Non-Octogenarians With Critical Limb Ischemia.. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1526602817711424.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.