Radiology · 1996
MR sialography. Work in progress.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lomas D J, Carroll N R, Johnson G, Antoun N M, Freer C E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To develop a noninvasive method for demonstrating the main salivary gland duct systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors developed a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol that uses a heavily T2-weighted (echo time, 750 msec), fat-suppressed pulse sequence and rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement. The technique was optimized to depict fluid within a two-dimensional thick slab. A preliminary evaluation was performed by examining the major salivary gland ducts in 10 asymptomatic volunteers and three symptomatic patients with known salivary duct abnormalities.
RESULTS: The main parotid gland ducts were clearly demonstrated in all volunteers. The submandibular ducts were visible in all cases, although not always on projection images. In the three patients, the MR technique clearly demonstrated bilateral sialectasis, a calculus obstructing the left submandibular duct, and a fluid-filled ranula, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary work indicates that this MR technique can successfully demonstrate both normal and abnormal parotid and submandibular gland duct systems and has several advantages over conventional x-ray sialography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors developed a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol that uses a heavily T2-weighted (echo time, 750 msec), fat-suppressed pulse sequence and rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement. The technique was optimized to depict fluid within a two-dimensional thick slab. A preliminary evaluation was performed by examining the major salivary gland ducts in 10 asymptomatic volunteers and three symptomatic patients with known salivary duct abnormalities.
RESULTS: The main parotid gland ducts were clearly demonstrated in all volunteers. The submandibular ducts were visible in all cases, although not always on projection images. In the three patients, the MR technique clearly demonstrated bilateral sialectasis, a calculus obstructing the left submandibular duct, and a fluid-filled ranula, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Preliminary work indicates that this MR technique can successfully demonstrate both normal and abnormal parotid and submandibular gland duct systems and has several advantages over conventional x-ray sialography.