Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2019
Simo decoction versus domperidone suspension for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial.
Equivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xiao Yingkai, He Zhimei, Long Yi, Chen Weisheng, Chen Dezhu, Chi Ruibin, Ye Heng, Deng Xi, Lv Bo, Sun Cheng, Hu Bei, Nie Zhiqiang, Gu Shaodong, Chen Chunbo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Leveraging prokinetics to facilitate trans-pyloric migration is a conventional strategy. However, due to restrictions on the use of domperidone suspension, oral prokinetics is relatively modest. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of simo decoction as an alternative to domperidone suspension in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral nasoenteric tubes.
METHODS: A prospective, open-label, parallel, and non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was performed involving critically ill adults in 6 university hospitals in China between September 2017 and May 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either simo decoction 20 ml q8h, or domperidone suspension 20 mg/20 ml q6h for 24 h. The primary outcome was procedure success defined as post-pyloric placement (spiral nasoenteric tubes reached the first portion of the duodenum or beyond confirmed by abdominal X-ray 24 h after tube insertion).
RESULTS: Of 268 patients assessed for eligibility, 224 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the simo decoction group or the domperidone suspension group (n = 112 per group). The success rate of post-pyloric placement was 41.1% (46/112) in the simo decoction group, as compared with 47.3% (53/112) in the domperidone suspension group (a risk difference of -6.3%, 95% CI, -19.2% to 6.7%, adjusted risk difference -3.7%, 95% CI -16.3% to 9.0%), in the intention-to-treat analysis, crossing the prespecified margin of -10% for non-inferiority. There were no differences between groups in the success rates of post-D1 (reaching the second portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D2 (reaching the third portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D3 (reaching the fourth portion of the duodenum or beyond) and proximal jejunum placement, the incidences of any adverse events, length of ICU stay or mortality in ICU.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of simo decoction to domperidone suspension was not confirmed in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral nasoenteric tubes. Registration: The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR-INR-17011311).
METHODS: A prospective, open-label, parallel, and non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was performed involving critically ill adults in 6 university hospitals in China between September 2017 and May 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either simo decoction 20 ml q8h, or domperidone suspension 20 mg/20 ml q6h for 24 h. The primary outcome was procedure success defined as post-pyloric placement (spiral nasoenteric tubes reached the first portion of the duodenum or beyond confirmed by abdominal X-ray 24 h after tube insertion).
RESULTS: Of 268 patients assessed for eligibility, 224 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the simo decoction group or the domperidone suspension group (n = 112 per group). The success rate of post-pyloric placement was 41.1% (46/112) in the simo decoction group, as compared with 47.3% (53/112) in the domperidone suspension group (a risk difference of -6.3%, 95% CI, -19.2% to 6.7%, adjusted risk difference -3.7%, 95% CI -16.3% to 9.0%), in the intention-to-treat analysis, crossing the prespecified margin of -10% for non-inferiority. There were no differences between groups in the success rates of post-D1 (reaching the second portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D2 (reaching the third portion of the duodenum or beyond), post-D3 (reaching the fourth portion of the duodenum or beyond) and proximal jejunum placement, the incidences of any adverse events, length of ICU stay or mortality in ICU.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of simo decoction to domperidone suspension was not confirmed in facilitating post-pyloric placement of spiral nasoenteric tubes. Registration: The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR-INR-17011311).