Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2020
Clinicopathological and Molecular Characterisation of Crohn's Disease-associated Small Bowel Adenocarcinomas.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liao Xiaoyan, Li Guangyuan, McBride Russel, Houldsworth Jane, Harpaz Noam, Polydorides Alexandros D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small bowel adenocarcinoma [SBA] is a recognised complication of Crohn's disease [CD], but its low absolute prevalence limits opportunities for clinicopathological characterisation.
METHODS: We compared the clinical, pathological, and molecular features of 48 SBA from patients with CD [CDSBA] and 29 SBAs from patients without CD [NSBA] who underwent treatment at our tertiary care centre between 2000 and 2018.
RESULTS: Patients with CDSBA were younger than those with NSBA [mean age, 56 vs 64; p = 0.02]. Males predominated in both groups. Most CDSBA [69%] occurred in the ileum, whereas most NSBA occurred in the duodenum [38%] and jejunum [31%; p < 0.001]. Stage I tumours were more prevalent in the CDSBA [33% vs 3%; p = 0.002], although the rates of Stage IV disease and disease-specific mortality were similar in both groups. CDSBA were less likely to present a discrete mass [35% vs 93%; p < 0.001] and were more often stricturing or fistulising [75% vs 10%, respectively, p < 0.001] than NSBA. Microscopically, CDSBA were relatively heterogeneous, exhibiting at least three distinct growth patterns in 39% compared with 1% of NSBA [p = 0.01]. Low-grade tubuloglandular adenocarcinoma was the predominant pattern in 19% of CDSBA compared with 0% of NSBA [p = 0.003]. CDSBA were more frequently DNA mismatch repair proficient [90% vs 62%; p = 0.04] and exhibited profiles of frequently mutated genes similar to those of NSBA, except for IDH1 [18%] and SMAD4 [12%] mutations that occurred uniquely in CDSBA.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations, based on the largest single-centre series described hitherto, establish that CDSBA is a distinct clinical, pathological, and molecular entity.
METHODS: We compared the clinical, pathological, and molecular features of 48 SBA from patients with CD [CDSBA] and 29 SBAs from patients without CD [NSBA] who underwent treatment at our tertiary care centre between 2000 and 2018.
RESULTS: Patients with CDSBA were younger than those with NSBA [mean age, 56 vs 64; p = 0.02]. Males predominated in both groups. Most CDSBA [69%] occurred in the ileum, whereas most NSBA occurred in the duodenum [38%] and jejunum [31%; p < 0.001]. Stage I tumours were more prevalent in the CDSBA [33% vs 3%; p = 0.002], although the rates of Stage IV disease and disease-specific mortality were similar in both groups. CDSBA were less likely to present a discrete mass [35% vs 93%; p < 0.001] and were more often stricturing or fistulising [75% vs 10%, respectively, p < 0.001] than NSBA. Microscopically, CDSBA were relatively heterogeneous, exhibiting at least three distinct growth patterns in 39% compared with 1% of NSBA [p = 0.01]. Low-grade tubuloglandular adenocarcinoma was the predominant pattern in 19% of CDSBA compared with 0% of NSBA [p = 0.003]. CDSBA were more frequently DNA mismatch repair proficient [90% vs 62%; p = 0.04] and exhibited profiles of frequently mutated genes similar to those of NSBA, except for IDH1 [18%] and SMAD4 [12%] mutations that occurred uniquely in CDSBA.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations, based on the largest single-centre series described hitherto, establish that CDSBA is a distinct clinical, pathological, and molecular entity.