MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3487

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2010

Selective irrigation of paranasal sinuses in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic sinusitis.

Moshaver Ali, Velazquez-Villasenor Louis, Lavigne Francois, Witterick Ian J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to medical and surgical therapy is a challenging entity to treat. Topical antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs have been increasingly used in managing this disorder. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the role of maxillary sinus antrostomy tubes (MAST) in selectively irrigating paranasal sinuses with topical antibiotics with anti-inflammatory in treating recalcitrant CRS. A prospective clinical trial was performed at a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with failed maximal medical and surgical therapies for chronic sinusitis were enrolled in the study. Endoscopic scores as well as the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 16 (SNOT-16) scores were obtained before and 3, 8, and 16 weeks after maxillary sinus intubation with MAST. All patients received topical antibiotics with anti-inflammatory medication for 21 days.

RESULTS

Statistically significant reductions in SNOT-16 and endoscopic scores were found before and after topical irrigations. Both scores continued to improve at the 8th and 16th weeks.

CONCLUSION

Selective irrigation of maxillary sinuses using MAST is a viable alternative in treating recalcitrant CRS.

Для цитирования: Moshaver Ali, Velazquez-Villasenor Louis, Lavigne Francois, Witterick Ian J. Selective irrigation of paranasal sinuses in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic sinusitis.. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2010. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3487.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.