Acta cytologica · 2016
Review of Cytology Practice at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital before and after High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bibbo Marluce, Wang Zi-Xuan, Jones Krister, Solomides Charalambos, Draganova-Tacheva Rossitza, Stapp Robert
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective review of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing to assess whether the cytology practice in our institution was affected by the introduction of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) assays over time.
STUDY DESIGN: Cytology, HPV and histopathology records were retrieved from our laboratory information system from 2003 to 2015. Records for Digene Hybrid Capture 2®, Hologic Cervista® and Roche Cobas® HPV assays were obtained. A 3-month follow-up for HPV detected cases was performed, and results were correlated with cytology and biopsies. A 1-year follow-up of HPV 16/18 and other HR HPV detected cases was also performed.
RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, a noticeable decrease in Pap testing volume occurred, from 11,792 to 4,664, while the percentage of HPV testing increased from 19 to 59%. Similar HPV detection rates and follow-up results for both reflex and cotesting were observed in the 3 HPV assays.
CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in Pap testing was due to the lengthening of the test interval when cotesting results were negative. Practitioners adhering to guidelines accounts for increased molecular testing volume. A trend towards higher-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the follow-up of detected HPV 16/18 was noted. So far there has been no demand for HPV as a stand-alone test.
STUDY DESIGN: Cytology, HPV and histopathology records were retrieved from our laboratory information system from 2003 to 2015. Records for Digene Hybrid Capture 2®, Hologic Cervista® and Roche Cobas® HPV assays were obtained. A 3-month follow-up for HPV detected cases was performed, and results were correlated with cytology and biopsies. A 1-year follow-up of HPV 16/18 and other HR HPV detected cases was also performed.
RESULTS: From 2008 to 2015, a noticeable decrease in Pap testing volume occurred, from 11,792 to 4,664, while the percentage of HPV testing increased from 19 to 59%. Similar HPV detection rates and follow-up results for both reflex and cotesting were observed in the 3 HPV assays.
CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in Pap testing was due to the lengthening of the test interval when cotesting results were negative. Practitioners adhering to guidelines accounts for increased molecular testing volume. A trend towards higher-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the follow-up of detected HPV 16/18 was noted. So far there has been no demand for HPV as a stand-alone test.