Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 1996
[A clinical study of radial prostatectomy].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hotta H, Miyao N, Masumori N, Takahashi A, Sasamura K, Kitamura H, Tsukamoto T, Takatsuka K, Adachi H, Takagi Y, Takagi S, Umehara T, Kimura M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of radical prostatectomy for patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
METHODS: From 1990 to 1994, a total of 50 patients with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Eleven patients were in state A2, 34 in stage B and 5 in stage C according to clinical stage. Extended disease was observed pathologically in 45%, and 59% of patients in clinical stages A2 and B, respectively. Preoperative serum PSA levels were closely correlated with pathological extension of the disease. The disease-free rates for organ-confined disease, extended disease without lymph node metastasis and stage D1 disease were 75% (3 years), 82% (2 years) and 80% (3 years), respectively. Four patients had rectal injuries, and three of these underwent temporary colostomy diversion. Two patients had bladder neck contracture and received internal urethrotomy. Urinary incontinence improved in 60% of patients during the first 6 post-operative and in 90% of patients within 12 post-operative months. Urinary incontinence tended to improve earlier in patients with nerve-sparing than those without it. The erectile capacity in nerve sparing patients recovered good.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that radical prostatectomy is a safe and temporarily satisfactory treatment for the patient with organ-confined prostate cancer.
METHODS: From 1990 to 1994, a total of 50 patients with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Eleven patients were in state A2, 34 in stage B and 5 in stage C according to clinical stage. Extended disease was observed pathologically in 45%, and 59% of patients in clinical stages A2 and B, respectively. Preoperative serum PSA levels were closely correlated with pathological extension of the disease. The disease-free rates for organ-confined disease, extended disease without lymph node metastasis and stage D1 disease were 75% (3 years), 82% (2 years) and 80% (3 years), respectively. Four patients had rectal injuries, and three of these underwent temporary colostomy diversion. Two patients had bladder neck contracture and received internal urethrotomy. Urinary incontinence improved in 60% of patients during the first 6 post-operative and in 90% of patients within 12 post-operative months. Urinary incontinence tended to improve earlier in patients with nerve-sparing than those without it. The erectile capacity in nerve sparing patients recovered good.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that radical prostatectomy is a safe and temporarily satisfactory treatment for the patient with organ-confined prostate cancer.