Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2021
A study on preserving endometrial glandular architecture during preparation using BD SurePath™ liquid-based cytology reagents: Cellular fixation with preservative fluid requires at least 18 h.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nishikawa Takeshi, Suzuki Hisae, Takeuchi Mao, Tatsumi Shigenobu, Tachibana Yuma, Ohbayashi Chiho, Kobayashi Tadao K, Norimatsu Yoshiaki
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the causes of disruption of the three-dimensional architecture of endometrial glands prepared using BD SurePath™ liquid-based cytology (SP-LBC) reagents. One sample preparation method for endometrial cytology is presented in which this three-dimensional architecture can be retained.
METHODS: SP-LBC specimens were prepared by the following three methods: (1) using the BD PrepMateTM (PrepMate) System after cellular fixation for 1-6 h (method A); (2) without using the PrepMate System after cellular fixation for 1-6 h (method B); and (3) using the PrepMate System after cellular fixation for at least 18 h (method C). Size and numbers of endometrial cell clusters and numbers of solitary scattered cells were then evaluated.
RESULTS: Significantly higher numbers of cell clusters with a major axis of 200 μm or more were yielded by method C (71.3 ± 57.2) than methods A (9.3 ± 5.9, P < 0.001) or B (44.3 ± 28.8, P < 0.05). Method B yielded significantly higher numbers of cell clusters than method A (P < 0.001). Method A (132.2 ± 107.7, p < 0.001) yielded significantly higher numbers of solitary scattered cells than methods B (29.1 ± 14.8) and C (35.7 ± 23.3). No significant difference in solitary cell numbers was found between methods B and C.
CONCLUSIONS: Retention of endometrial glandular architecture is rendered possible by allowing sample fixation times of 18 h or more when preparing specimens using the PrepMate System.
METHODS: SP-LBC specimens were prepared by the following three methods: (1) using the BD PrepMateTM (PrepMate) System after cellular fixation for 1-6 h (method A); (2) without using the PrepMate System after cellular fixation for 1-6 h (method B); and (3) using the PrepMate System after cellular fixation for at least 18 h (method C). Size and numbers of endometrial cell clusters and numbers of solitary scattered cells were then evaluated.
RESULTS: Significantly higher numbers of cell clusters with a major axis of 200 μm or more were yielded by method C (71.3 ± 57.2) than methods A (9.3 ± 5.9, P < 0.001) or B (44.3 ± 28.8, P < 0.05). Method B yielded significantly higher numbers of cell clusters than method A (P < 0.001). Method A (132.2 ± 107.7, p < 0.001) yielded significantly higher numbers of solitary scattered cells than methods B (29.1 ± 14.8) and C (35.7 ± 23.3). No significant difference in solitary cell numbers was found between methods B and C.
CONCLUSIONS: Retention of endometrial glandular architecture is rendered possible by allowing sample fixation times of 18 h or more when preparing specimens using the PrepMate System.