American journal of clinical oncology · 2011
Age has no significant impact on overall survival and on treatment tolerability in relapsed stage IV cutaneous malignant melanoma patients receiving Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Treosulfan.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Atzpodien Jens, Terfloth Kerstin, Fluck Michael, Reitz Martina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy and tolerability of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan (CGT) therapy in younger patients (age, <60 years) and in elderly patients (age, ≥60 years) with pretreated relapsed American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV cutaneous malignant melanoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 91 patients at the age of 18 to 80 years, in relapse after first-, second-, or third-line therapy received 40 mg/m intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin, 1000 mg/m i.v. gemcitabine, and 2500 mg/m i.v. treosulfan on days 1 and 8. CGT-therapy was repeated every 5 weeks until progression of disease occurred.
RESULTS: Younger (n = 49) and elderly (n = 42) patients showed a significant difference in disease stabilization in 25% versus 7% (P ≤ 0.05), as opposed to 69% versus 91% patients exhibiting disease progression. In contrast, the overall median survival probability was not significantly different (P = 0.8153). Neither treatment-related toxicity nor toxicity-associated dose reduction showed substantial differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that CGT therapy could be safely administered to a patient up to age 80 years.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 91 patients at the age of 18 to 80 years, in relapse after first-, second-, or third-line therapy received 40 mg/m intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin, 1000 mg/m i.v. gemcitabine, and 2500 mg/m i.v. treosulfan on days 1 and 8. CGT-therapy was repeated every 5 weeks until progression of disease occurred.
RESULTS: Younger (n = 49) and elderly (n = 42) patients showed a significant difference in disease stabilization in 25% versus 7% (P ≤ 0.05), as opposed to 69% versus 91% patients exhibiting disease progression. In contrast, the overall median survival probability was not significantly different (P = 0.8153). Neither treatment-related toxicity nor toxicity-associated dose reduction showed substantial differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that CGT therapy could be safely administered to a patient up to age 80 years.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBusulfanCisplatinDeoxycytidineDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRemission InductionSkin NeoplasmsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGemcitabine