American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2000
Cauterization of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization is an effective surgical treatment associated with improved pregnancy rates.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stadtmauer L A, Riehl R M, Toma S K, Talbert L M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether proximal tubal cauterization is an effective method of reversing the decreased pregnancy rates seen in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with hydrosalpinges present.
STUDY DESIGN: We studied a group of 94 patients with tubal factor infertility. Sixty patients had hydrosalpinges documented by either hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy, or both. Forty-five had surgical treatment of hydrosalpinges by salpingectomy or by proximal tubal cauterization. In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer was performed within 3 months after surgery. Pregnancy and implantation rates were compared.
RESULTS: Patients with hydrosalpinx had significantly decreased clinical pregnancy and implantation rates per cycle (14% and 8%, respectively) compared with those of patients undergoing proximal tubal cauterization before the in vitro fertilization cycle (73% and 36%, respectively). These pregnancy and implantation rates are comparable with those found in patients with tubal factor infertility without hydrosalpinges (53% and 22%, respectively), as well as in salpingectomy-treated patients (46% and 24%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal tubal cauterization is effective in reversing the adverse effects of hydrosalpinges.
STUDY DESIGN: We studied a group of 94 patients with tubal factor infertility. Sixty patients had hydrosalpinges documented by either hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy, or both. Forty-five had surgical treatment of hydrosalpinges by salpingectomy or by proximal tubal cauterization. In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer was performed within 3 months after surgery. Pregnancy and implantation rates were compared.
RESULTS: Patients with hydrosalpinx had significantly decreased clinical pregnancy and implantation rates per cycle (14% and 8%, respectively) compared with those of patients undergoing proximal tubal cauterization before the in vitro fertilization cycle (73% and 36%, respectively). These pregnancy and implantation rates are comparable with those found in patients with tubal factor infertility without hydrosalpinges (53% and 22%, respectively), as well as in salpingectomy-treated patients (46% and 24%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal tubal cauterization is effective in reversing the adverse effects of hydrosalpinges.