MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/003130200104277

Медицинская библиотека · Pathology · 2000

An immunohistochemical study of the rete ovarii and epoophoron.

Woolnough E, Russo L, Khan M S, Heatley M K

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A study to compare the immuno-histochemical profile of the human rete ovarii, and epoophoron, with the Fallopian tube and ovarian surface epithelium was performed with 31 antibodies and antisera. A reaction was present in the epithelial cytoplasm of the rete ovarii and epoophoron of mesonephric origin, for vimentin, GFAP, cytokeratin markers, (AE1/AE3, MNF116; Cam 5.2, 34 beta E12 and for the monospecific antibodies to cytokeratins 7 and 19), heat shock protein 27, in the cell membrane for HBME-1, EMA and in the subepithelial collagen for collagen IV. Reactions were present only in the epithelium in the rete ovarii for EGFR (one case) and CA-125 (four cases). A reaction was present in the epithelium of the epoophoron only for Ber-EP-4 and S100. There was no reaction with antibodies for desmin, neurofilament protein, cytokeratins 20 or 14, actin, calretinin, E-cadherin, C-erb-B2, or CEA (monoclonal and polyclonal reagents). The immuno-histochemical profile of the Fallopian tube was consistent with its para-mesonephric origin and that in the ovarian surface epithelium was consistent with a proposed modified mesothelial origin. This study provides an immunohistochemical profile of these structures with a large panel of commonly available antibodies and antisera, confirming and extending the findings described in previous studies.

Для цитирования: Woolnough E, Russo L, Khan M S, Heatley M K. An immunohistochemical study of the rete ovarii and epoophoron.. Pathology. 2000. DOI: 10.1080/003130200104277.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.