Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2004
Treatment results of endometrial carcinoma with positive peritoneal washing, adnexal involvement and serosal involvement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wong F C S, Pang C P, Tang S K, Tung S Y, Leung T W, Sze W K, Cheung K B
Аннотация
AIMS: To review the treatment results of patients with endometrial carcinoma having positive peritoneal washing (PPW), adnexal involvement, uterine serosal involvement, or all three.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment records of patients who had undergone primary surgery for endometrial cancer without distant metastasis during 1990--2001 at the Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, were reviewed. Thirty-five patients were found to have involvement of positive PPW, adnexal involvement, uterine serosal involvement, or all three. Seven (20%) of them had gross or microscopic lymph-node metastasis. Thirty-three (94.3%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (28 whole-pelvic irradiation [WPI]; five abdominal radiotherapy [WART]). Two patients with solitary ovarian metastasis received chemotherapy, and one with isolated PPW also received adjuvant hormonal therapy. The median follow-up was 50.4 months (range 2.4-151.2 months). Multivariate analysis was carried out using the Cox regression proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Among the 28 patients with clinical or pathological node-negative disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage IIIA), only two patients with solitary ovarian metastases developed recurrence. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rates for the whole group and patients without lymph-node involvement were 77.9% and 91.7%, respectively. Five out of the seven patients with lymph-node involvement developed recurrences. Univariate analysis showed that lymph-node involvement (P < 0.0001) and high-grade disease (P = 0.011) were the significant poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph-node involvement was the only significant poor prognostic factor to predict poor 5-year DFS (P = 0.0001). Only one patient (3.7%) who had received WART developed grade 4 toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that good treatment results could be obtained from patients with stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma without clinical or pathological lymph-node involvement after adjuvant radiotherapy, with acceptable late side-effects. The relative prognostic importance of individual IIIA involvement and the optimal adjuvant treatment remain to be determined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatment records of patients who had undergone primary surgery for endometrial cancer without distant metastasis during 1990--2001 at the Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, were reviewed. Thirty-five patients were found to have involvement of positive PPW, adnexal involvement, uterine serosal involvement, or all three. Seven (20%) of them had gross or microscopic lymph-node metastasis. Thirty-three (94.3%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (28 whole-pelvic irradiation [WPI]; five abdominal radiotherapy [WART]). Two patients with solitary ovarian metastasis received chemotherapy, and one with isolated PPW also received adjuvant hormonal therapy. The median follow-up was 50.4 months (range 2.4-151.2 months). Multivariate analysis was carried out using the Cox regression proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Among the 28 patients with clinical or pathological node-negative disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage IIIA), only two patients with solitary ovarian metastases developed recurrence. The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rates for the whole group and patients without lymph-node involvement were 77.9% and 91.7%, respectively. Five out of the seven patients with lymph-node involvement developed recurrences. Univariate analysis showed that lymph-node involvement (P < 0.0001) and high-grade disease (P = 0.011) were the significant poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph-node involvement was the only significant poor prognostic factor to predict poor 5-year DFS (P = 0.0001). Only one patient (3.7%) who had received WART developed grade 4 toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that good treatment results could be obtained from patients with stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma without clinical or pathological lymph-node involvement after adjuvant radiotherapy, with acceptable late side-effects. The relative prognostic importance of individual IIIA involvement and the optimal adjuvant treatment remain to be determined.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAscitic FluidChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymph NodesLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyometriumNeoplasm StagingOvaryPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantReview Literature as TopicRisk FactorsSurvival RateTreatment Outcome