Obstetrics and gynecology · 2004
Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta and percreta with ultrasonography, color Doppler, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taipale Pekka, Orden Maija-Riitta, Berg Marja, Manninen Hannu, Alafuzoff Irina
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The risk of placenta previa and accreta is increased in females with previous cesarean deliveries, and there has been an increasing number of these operations.
CASES: We present 2 cases with previous cesarean and placenta previa in the following pregnancy. One patient had placenta accreta and the other, placenta percreta. In both cases, prenatal diagnosis was based on ultrasonography, where features such as loss of the hypoechoic retroplacental zone and irregular uterine serosa were found in grayscale ultrasonography. In color Doppler imaging, in both cases, increased vascularity between myometrium and placenta, as well as intraplacental lacunae, were seen. Thinning of the uterine wall, found in magnetic resonance imaging, contributed to the diagnosis of placenta percreta.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta is of importance because it reduces fetal and maternal morbidity as appropriate preoperative and perioperative procedures are possible.
CASES: We present 2 cases with previous cesarean and placenta previa in the following pregnancy. One patient had placenta accreta and the other, placenta percreta. In both cases, prenatal diagnosis was based on ultrasonography, where features such as loss of the hypoechoic retroplacental zone and irregular uterine serosa were found in grayscale ultrasonography. In color Doppler imaging, in both cases, increased vascularity between myometrium and placenta, as well as intraplacental lacunae, were seen. Thinning of the uterine wall, found in magnetic resonance imaging, contributed to the diagnosis of placenta percreta.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta is of importance because it reduces fetal and maternal morbidity as appropriate preoperative and perioperative procedures are possible.