MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00324-6

Медицинская библиотека · Fertility and sterility · 1999

Hysteroscopic selective salpingography.

Inagaki N, Sato K, Toyoshima K, Ito K, Kitai H, Gabionza D T, Yoshimura Y

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of hysteroscopic selective salpingography (HSS) as a method for diagnosing the tubal proximal occlusion shown by hysterosalpingography (HSG).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Outpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital, Urawa, Japan.

PATIENT(S): A total of 572 infertile women underwent HSG. Forty-seven of 50 women with unilateral or bilateral proximal tubal occlusion demonstrated by HSG underwent HSS.

INTERVENTION(S): Hysteroscopic selective salpingography was performed for the diagnosis of tubal occlusion in cases in which the proximal tubal occlusion was shown by HSG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of patients who underwent HSS and pregnancy rate after HSS.

RESULT(S): Twenty-seven (79.4%) of 34 patients with unilateral occlusion diagnosed by HSG were shown to have normal patency by HSS. Of 12 women with bilaterally normal patent tubes confirmed by HSS, 8 (66.7%) achieved normal pregnancies within 1 year. Seven (53.8%) of 13 patients with bilateral occlusion found by HSG were shown to have normally patent tubes by HSS.

CONCLUSION

The simple method of HSS was clinically effective for evaluating the presence of proximal tubal occlusion.

Для цитирования: Inagaki N, Sato K, Toyoshima K, Ito K, Kitai H, Gabionza D T, Yoshimura Y. Hysteroscopic selective salpingography.. Fertility and sterility. 1999. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00324-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.