MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24230

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2015

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the lip: A retrospective study.

Sollamo Erik Mikael Jan, Ilmonen Suvi Kristiina, Virolainen Maria Susanna, Suominen Sinikka Hilkka Helena

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically lymph node-negative (cN0) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lip deemed high risk for occult nodal metastasis.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with cT1 to T2 cN0 with SCC of the lip underwent SLNB at a tertiary referral center between January 2001 and March 2012. Initial staging methods were clinical examination only (65.4%), ultrasound (23.1%), or CT (11.5%). Operations were performed with the patients under local anesthesia with sedation (50%) or general anesthesia (50%).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 53 months. Three patients (11.5%) had a positive sentinel node and were upstaged. One SLNB-related complication was observed. Regional recurrence occurred in 2 patients (7.7%). The relationship between regional status and both tumor diameter and tumor thickness was statistically significant (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

SLNB can be a viable staging technique in SCC of the lip. Tumor diameter of ≥ 20 mm and increasing tumor thickness seem to delineate higher risk for regional disease in our study. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1375-E1380, 2016.

Для цитирования: Sollamo Erik Mikael Jan, Ilmonen Suvi Kristiina, Virolainen Maria Susanna, Suominen Sinikka Hilkka Helena. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the lip: A retrospective study.. Head & neck. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24230.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.