HNO · 2015
[Submental artery island flaps for reconstruction in the head and neck region].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bruchhage K-L, Wollenberg B, Schröder U
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of defects after extirpation of head and neck neoplasms is a highly challenging and complex surgical undertaking. Commonly used techniques, such as the radial forearm flap or anterior lateral thigh flap, have numerous disadvantages, e.g., donor-site morbidity, poor color match for cutaneous reconstruction, and excessive tissue bulk for intraoral reconstruction. Use of a submental artery island flap is a relatively new and increasingly performed option for reconstruction in the head and neck region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2013 to August 2015, 12 patients were treated with a submental island flap after surgical resection of intraoral carcinomas or cutaneous neoplasms of the lower half of the face.
CASE DESCRIPTION: This paper reports on two cases. The first case describes reconstruction of the floor of the mouth using a pull-through technique after resection of a squamous cell carcinoma. The submental flap was pedicled on the contralateral side, since neck dissection of regions I-V had been performed on the ipsilateral side. The second case is a reconstruction of the lower midface with parts of the upper lip, after removal of a cutaneous spinalioma. In a N0 neck, no neck dissection was performed. The flap healed without problems in both patients, leading to a very good functional and cosmetic outcome.
CONCLUSION: The submental island flap demonstrates reliability and versatility for head and neck reconstructions. Its minimal donor site morbidity, excellent cosmetic match, pliability, and relative ease of dissection and application confer a definite advantage over distant flaps.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2013 to August 2015, 12 patients were treated with a submental island flap after surgical resection of intraoral carcinomas or cutaneous neoplasms of the lower half of the face.
CASE DESCRIPTION: This paper reports on two cases. The first case describes reconstruction of the floor of the mouth using a pull-through technique after resection of a squamous cell carcinoma. The submental flap was pedicled on the contralateral side, since neck dissection of regions I-V had been performed on the ipsilateral side. The second case is a reconstruction of the lower midface with parts of the upper lip, after removal of a cutaneous spinalioma. In a N0 neck, no neck dissection was performed. The flap healed without problems in both patients, leading to a very good functional and cosmetic outcome.
CONCLUSION: The submental island flap demonstrates reliability and versatility for head and neck reconstructions. Its minimal donor site morbidity, excellent cosmetic match, pliability, and relative ease of dissection and application confer a definite advantage over distant flaps.