DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1587153
Comparative effects of arithmetic, speech, and motor dual-task walking on gait in stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The application of dual-task walking paradigms for gait assessment in stroke patients is critical, where varying concurrent tasks may elicit distinct gait patterns of dual-task interference. This study assessed the acute effects of different types of dual tasks on gait in stroke patients during task performance, informing occupational, and physical therapists about care recommendations to prevent patients from falling and improve their balance function in daily life.
METHODS
A total of 19 stroke patients (52.7 ± 6.9 years old) performed the walking-only and dual-task walking (motor, arithmetic and speech) task test while a 3D motion capture system measured the gait parameters (the gait spatial-temporal parameters, sagittal angle of lower-limb joints, gait parameter variability and dual-task cost). One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to test the effects of the above four walking conditions on gait parameters.
RESULTS
Arithmetic task and speech task interference can affect the gait of stroke patients (P < 0.05). Arithmetic task interference has the greatest impact on step speed, cadence, single support phase, hip joint range in support period and has the greatest dual-task cost, speech task interference has the greatest impact on cadence coefficient of variation (P < 0.05). The motor task was not significantly different from walking-only (P >0.05).
CONCLUSION
Both arithmetic and speech tasks have a great impact on gait in stroke patients. Faced with cognitive interference, stroke patients spontaneously adopted a "cautious gait" walking pattern. In future rehabilitation training, diversity of task types is critical for gait rehabilitation training based on the walking ability of the patients.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.