MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.26502/jsr.10020270

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of surgery and research · 2022

Anatomical Injury Clusters in Polytrauma Patients.

Birri Tanja, Pape Hans-Christoph, Dennler Cyrill, Simmen Hans-Peter, Vomela Jindrich, Chaloupka Richard, Mica Ladislav

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Polytrauma is a major cause of death in young adults. The trial was to identify clusters of interlinked anatomical regions to improve strategical operational planning in the acute situation. A total of 2219 polytrauma patients with an ISS (Injury Severity Score) ≥ 16 and an age ≥ 16 years was included into this retrospective cohort study. Pearson's correlation was performed amongst the AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale) groups. The predictive quality was tested by ROC (Receiver Operating Curve) and their area under the curve. Independency was tested by the binary logistic regression, AIS ≥3 was taken as a significant injury. The analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS® 24.0. The highest predictive value was reached in the combination of thorax, abdomen, pelvis and spine injuries (ROC: abdomen for thorax 0.647, thorax for abdomen 0.621, pelvis for thorax 0.608, pelvis for abdomen 0.651, spine for thorax 0.617). The binary logistic regression revealed the anatomical regions thorax, abdomen pelvis and spine as per-mutative independent predictors for each other when a particular injury exceeded the AIS ≥3. The documented clusters of injuries in truncal trauma are crucial to define priorities in the polytrauma management.

Для цитирования: Birri Tanja, Pape Hans-Christoph, Dennler Cyrill, Simmen Hans-Peter, Vomela Jindrich, Chaloupka Richard, Mica Ladislav. Anatomical Injury Clusters in Polytrauma Patients.. Journal of surgery and research. 2022. DOI: 10.26502/jsr.10020270.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.