Clinical neuroradiology · 2019
Assessment of Melanin Content and its Influence on Susceptibility Contrast in Melanoma Metastases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Straub Sina, Laun Frederik B, Freitag Martin T, Kölsche Christian, von Deimling Andreas, Denoix Michael, Bendszus Martin, Schlemmer Heinz-Peter, Ladd Mark E, Schneider Till M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To quantify the influence of melanin content on magnetic susceptibility of cerebral melanoma metastases.
METHODS: Patients with non-hemorrhagic metastases were included based on the absence of susceptibility blooming artifacts. Susceptibility maps were calculated from 3D gradient echo data, using Laplacian-based phase unwrapping, sophisticated harmonic artefact reduction for phase data (V-SHARP) with varying spherical kernel sizes for background field removal and the iLSQR algorithm for the inversion of phase data. Susceptibility maps were referenced to cerebrospinal fluid. Non-hemorrhagic metastases were identified on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and susceptibility weighted images. Metastases masks were drawn on T1-weighted post-contrast images and used to compute mean susceptibility values of each metastasis.
RESULTS: A total of 33 non-hemorrhagic melanoma brain metastases in 20 patients were quantitatively evaluated. Metastases without and with hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images, which corresponds to the melanin content, showed median susceptibility values of -0.028 ppm and -0.020 ppm, respectively. The susceptibility differences between metastases without and with T1-weighted hyperintense signal was not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Non-hemorrhagic cerebral melanoma metastases showed weak diamagnetic susceptibility values and susceptibility did not significantly correlate to T1-weighted signals. Therefore, melanin does not seem to be a major contributor to susceptibility in cerebral melanoma metastases.
METHODS: Patients with non-hemorrhagic metastases were included based on the absence of susceptibility blooming artifacts. Susceptibility maps were calculated from 3D gradient echo data, using Laplacian-based phase unwrapping, sophisticated harmonic artefact reduction for phase data (V-SHARP) with varying spherical kernel sizes for background field removal and the iLSQR algorithm for the inversion of phase data. Susceptibility maps were referenced to cerebrospinal fluid. Non-hemorrhagic metastases were identified on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and susceptibility weighted images. Metastases masks were drawn on T1-weighted post-contrast images and used to compute mean susceptibility values of each metastasis.
RESULTS: A total of 33 non-hemorrhagic melanoma brain metastases in 20 patients were quantitatively evaluated. Metastases without and with hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images, which corresponds to the melanin content, showed median susceptibility values of -0.028 ppm and -0.020 ppm, respectively. The susceptibility differences between metastases without and with T1-weighted hyperintense signal was not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Non-hemorrhagic cerebral melanoma metastases showed weak diamagnetic susceptibility values and susceptibility did not significantly correlate to T1-weighted signals. Therefore, melanin does not seem to be a major contributor to susceptibility in cerebral melanoma metastases.