MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/cam4.71364

Медицинская библиотека · Cancer medicine · 2025

Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Their Responses to Most Searched Spanish Cancer Questions.

Cheng En, Anampa Jesus D, Bernabe-Ramirez Carolina, Lin Juan, Xue Xiaonan, Isasi Carmen R, Moadel-Robblee Alyson B, Chu Edward

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots perform well in answering English cancer questions. For Spanish, their performance is unknown and may differ by free vs. paywall versions.

METHODS

We evaluated the quality (range: 1-5 points), actionability (range: 0-100%), and readability (range: 1-13 grades) of six popular AI chatbots in responding to the 15 most searched Spanish questions regarding breast, prostate, and colon cancer.

RESULTS

The quality of overall AI chatbot responses was good (mean [95% CI]: 3.5 [3.4-3.6] points), while the actionability was low (mean [95% CI]: 35.6% [30.8%-40.3%]). The readability was high-school-level (mean [95% CI]: 9.2 [8.8-9.6] grades), not concordant with the American Medical Association recommendation (≤ 6th grade). The quality, actionability, and readability did not differ by free and paywall versions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested AI chatbots may generate good-quality responses to Spanish cancer questions, regardless of free or paywall versions. However, further improvement in actionability and readability is needed to benefit Spanish-speaking patients.

Для цитирования: Cheng En, Anampa Jesus D, Bernabe-Ramirez Carolina, Lin Juan, Xue Xiaonan, Isasi Carmen R, Moadel-Robblee Alyson B, Chu Edward. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Their Responses to Most Searched Spanish Cancer Questions.. Cancer medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.71364.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.