Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2013
Development of an in-house endoanal ultrasound teaching phantom.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shobeiri S Abbas, Rostaminia Ghazaleh, Shobeiri Hediyeh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to construct an anatomically correct phantom for visualization of anal sphincter complex structures.
METHODS: To ake an endoanal ultrasound phantom, we experimented with a variety of commercially available materials to simulate hyperechoic, hypoechoic, and isoechoic tissue consistency. We created external anal sphincter muscle and the levator plate using stand-alone density gel and microbubbles to simulate the echogenicity of the muscles. A mold was created in a container, the muscles were inserted, and the mold was filled with high-density clear gel and allowed to fill. Once finished, the container was sealed tightly and stored for later use. To evaluate the accuracy of the model, 6 ultrasound imaging raters from different disciplines were included. The raters were administered a 6-item Internet-based interactive test using 2-dimensional images obtained from scanning the phantom. Rater agreement was determined. The Fleiss κstatistic was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability.
RESULTS: The raters identified the structures in 32 (89%) of 36 test questions. There was good to excellent agreement among the readers. Agreement rates for visualization of the external anal sphincter, perineal body, and internal anal sphincter were 67%, 83%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: An endoanal phantom can be constructed as a simulator for endoanal sonography.
METHODS: To ake an endoanal ultrasound phantom, we experimented with a variety of commercially available materials to simulate hyperechoic, hypoechoic, and isoechoic tissue consistency. We created external anal sphincter muscle and the levator plate using stand-alone density gel and microbubbles to simulate the echogenicity of the muscles. A mold was created in a container, the muscles were inserted, and the mold was filled with high-density clear gel and allowed to fill. Once finished, the container was sealed tightly and stored for later use. To evaluate the accuracy of the model, 6 ultrasound imaging raters from different disciplines were included. The raters were administered a 6-item Internet-based interactive test using 2-dimensional images obtained from scanning the phantom. Rater agreement was determined. The Fleiss κstatistic was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability.
RESULTS: The raters identified the structures in 32 (89%) of 36 test questions. There was good to excellent agreement among the readers. Agreement rates for visualization of the external anal sphincter, perineal body, and internal anal sphincter were 67%, 83%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: An endoanal phantom can be constructed as a simulator for endoanal sonography.