Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
Diminishing Returns Among Black Patients With Cancer: The Intersection of Race and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McCullough Lauren E, Barber Lauren E, Nash Rebecca, Collin Lindsay J, Maliniak Maret L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Despite narrowing racial gaps, disparities persist across cancer types and socioeconomic levels. The diminishing returns hypothesis suggests that economic advantage yields fewer health benefits for Black individuals but is largely unexplored in the context of cancer. We examined the diminishing returns among Black and White individuals across cancer types using a nationally representative study population.
METHODS: The study analyzed cancer-specific survival among 5.3 million non-Hispanic Black and White adults diagnosed with primary cancer (2006-2020) using SEER-22. We assessed how race and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) jointly affects survival across 21 cancer types. A 10-level race-SES variable was created, using White individuals in the highest-SES group as the reference. The main outcome was cancer-specific death. Diminishing returns were defined quantitively and qualitatively as worse survival for Black individuals even at higher SES. Cox models adjusted for demographics and clinical factors, with multiple imputation for missing data. Social gradients were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Black women showed strong evidence of diminishing returns overall and for seven cancers, especially uterine and breast cancers. A social gradient was also evident in cancers with diminishing returns, except uterine cancer. For Black men, diminishing returns were not observed across all cancers combined but was present in eight cancers-including prostate and colorectal cancers. Most cancers among men exhibited a strong social gradient. Findings were consistent by time period and upon restricting to localized and regional disease in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Higher SES improves cancer survival for White patients but not Black patients, worsening racial disparities for certain cancers.
METHODS: The study analyzed cancer-specific survival among 5.3 million non-Hispanic Black and White adults diagnosed with primary cancer (2006-2020) using SEER-22. We assessed how race and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) jointly affects survival across 21 cancer types. A 10-level race-SES variable was created, using White individuals in the highest-SES group as the reference. The main outcome was cancer-specific death. Diminishing returns were defined quantitively and qualitatively as worse survival for Black individuals even at higher SES. Cox models adjusted for demographics and clinical factors, with multiple imputation for missing data. Social gradients were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Black women showed strong evidence of diminishing returns overall and for seven cancers, especially uterine and breast cancers. A social gradient was also evident in cancers with diminishing returns, except uterine cancer. For Black men, diminishing returns were not observed across all cancers combined but was present in eight cancers-including prostate and colorectal cancers. Most cancers among men exhibited a strong social gradient. Findings were consistent by time period and upon restricting to localized and regional disease in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Higher SES improves cancer survival for White patients but not Black patients, worsening racial disparities for certain cancers.