MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21873/anticanres.15388

Медицинская библиотека · Anticancer research · 2021

Safety and Effectiveness of Areola-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer With Intraductal Lesions.

Tokisawa Hiromi, Aruga Tomoyuki, Honda Yayoi, Ishiba Toshiyuki, Yonekura Rika, Iwamoto Naoko, Kumaki Yuichi, Tomita Shoichi, Fujii Miwako, Terao Yasunobu

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: Areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM), a conservative mastectomy with nipple hollowing, can be applied to intraductal breast cancer with a tumour-nipple-areola complex (NAC) distance of ≤2 cm. Here, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ASM.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of 61 patients (64 breasts) who underwent ASM between 2016 and 2020.

RESULTS

Of the 64 breasts, 33 (51.6%) underwent ASM because the tumour-NAC distance on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was ≤2 cm. Two patients had positive excisional margins but these were at the posterior areola surface therefore additional resection was possible. Over a median postoperative observation period of 16 months (range=3-52 months), one patient developed chest wall recurrence that was resected and did not recur again.

CONCLUSION

For breast cancer with an extensive intraductal component, ASM is a good alternative to nipple-sparing mastectomy because it allows safe resection while maintaining aesthetics.

Для цитирования: Tokisawa Hiromi, Aruga Tomoyuki, Honda Yayoi, Ishiba Toshiyuki, Yonekura Rika, Iwamoto Naoko, Kumaki Yuichi, Tomita Shoichi, Fujii Miwako, Terao Yasunobu. Safety and Effectiveness of Areola-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer With Intraductal Lesions.. Anticancer research. 2021. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15388.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.