Journal of gastroenterology · 2020
Clinicopathological features and risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early-stage non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoshimizu Shoichi, Kawachi Hiroshi, Yamamoto Yorimasa, Nakano Kaoru, Horiuchi Yusuke, Ishiyama Akiyoshi, Tsuchida Tomohiro, Yoshio Toshiyuki, Hirasawa Toshiaki, Ito Hiromichi, Fujisaki Junko
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Management strategies for primary non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma (NADAC) in early stage are not well established given its low incidence. This study aimed to elucidate clinicopathological features of early NADAC, including risk for lymph nodal metastasis (LNM).
METHODS: In total, 166 patients with early NADAC underwent initial treatment at our institution between 2006 and 2019, of whom 153 had intramucosal (M-) and 13 had submucosal (SM-) NADAC. These endoscopic and pathological features were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for LNM were evaluated in 46 early NADAC patients who underwent surgery with lymph node dissection.
RESULTS: Compared with M-NADAC, SM-NADAC was significantly more frequently located at the proximal side of the papilla, with mixed elevated and depressed macroscopic type, histologically poorly differentiated tumor and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (85% vs. 47%, P = 0.009; 54% vs. 5%, P < 0.001; 23% vs. 0%, P < 0.001; and 46% vs. 0%, P < 0.001, respectively). The frequency of LNM was significantly higher in SM-NADAC than in M-NADAC (5/12, 42% vs. 0/34, 0%; P < 0.001). In SM-NADAC, the frequency of LNM was higher in poorly differentiated than in well to moderately differentiated tumors (3/3, 100% vs. 2/9, 22%) and higher in tumors with LVI than in those without LVI (3/5, 60% vs. 2/7, 29%). Regarding invasion depth, 2 of 4 patients with SM invasion (400 ≤ × < 500 µm) showed LNM. However, in this study, no patients developed very shallow SM invasion (0 < × < 400 µm).
CONCLUSIONS: SM-NADAC showed high LNM risk. Surgical treatment with regional lymph node dissection is recommended as a treatment strategy for SM-NADAC.
METHODS: In total, 166 patients with early NADAC underwent initial treatment at our institution between 2006 and 2019, of whom 153 had intramucosal (M-) and 13 had submucosal (SM-) NADAC. These endoscopic and pathological features were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for LNM were evaluated in 46 early NADAC patients who underwent surgery with lymph node dissection.
RESULTS: Compared with M-NADAC, SM-NADAC was significantly more frequently located at the proximal side of the papilla, with mixed elevated and depressed macroscopic type, histologically poorly differentiated tumor and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (85% vs. 47%, P = 0.009; 54% vs. 5%, P < 0.001; 23% vs. 0%, P < 0.001; and 46% vs. 0%, P < 0.001, respectively). The frequency of LNM was significantly higher in SM-NADAC than in M-NADAC (5/12, 42% vs. 0/34, 0%; P < 0.001). In SM-NADAC, the frequency of LNM was higher in poorly differentiated than in well to moderately differentiated tumors (3/3, 100% vs. 2/9, 22%) and higher in tumors with LVI than in those without LVI (3/5, 60% vs. 2/7, 29%). Regarding invasion depth, 2 of 4 patients with SM invasion (400 ≤ × < 500 µm) showed LNM. However, in this study, no patients developed very shallow SM invasion (0 < × < 400 µm).
CONCLUSIONS: SM-NADAC showed high LNM risk. Surgical treatment with regional lymph node dissection is recommended as a treatment strategy for SM-NADAC.