MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jnci/djab179

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022

An Artificial Intelligence System for the Detection of Bladder Cancer via Cystoscopy: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.

Wu Shaoxu, Chen Xiong, Pan Jiexin, Dong Wen, Diao Xiayao, Zhang Ruiyun, Zhang Yonghai, Zhang Yuanfeng, Qian Guang, Chen Hao, Lin Haotian, Xu Shizhong, Chen Zhiwen, Zhou Xiaozhou, Mei Hongbing, Wu Chenglong, Lv Qiang, Yuan Baorui, Chen Zeshi, Liao Wenjian, Yang Xuefan, Chen Haige, Huang Jian, Lin Tianxin

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cystoscopy plays an important role in bladder cancer (BCa) diagnosis and treatment, but its sensitivity needs improvement. Artificial intelligence has shown promise in endoscopy, but few cystoscopic applications have been reported. We report a Cystoscopy Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System (CAIDS) for BCa diagnosis.

METHODS

In total, 69 204 images from 10 729 consecutive patients from 6 hospitals were collected and divided into training, internal validation, and external validation sets. The CAIDS was built using a pyramid scene parsing network and transfer learning. A subset (n = 260) of the validation sets was used for a performance comparison between the CAIDS and urologists for complex lesion detection. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of the CAIDS were 0.977 (95% CI = 0.974 to 0.979) in the internal validation set and 0.990 (95% CI = 0.979 to 0.996), 0.982 (95% CI = 0.974 to 0.988), 0.978 (95% CI = 0.959 to 0.989), and 0.991 (95% CI = 0.987 to 0.994) in different external validation sets. In the CAIDS vs urologists' comparisons, the CAIDS showed high accuracy and sensitivity (accuracy = 0.939, 95% CI = 0.902 to 0.964; sensitivity = 0.954, 95% CI = 0.902 to 0.983) with a short latency of 12 seconds, much more accurate and quicker than the expert urologists.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAIDS achieved accurate BCa detection with a short latency. The CAIDS may provide many clinical benefits, from increasing the diagnostic accuracy for BCa, even for commonly misdiagnosed cases such as flat cancerous tissue (carcinoma in situ), to reducing the operation time for cystoscopy.

Для цитирования: Wu Shaoxu, Chen Xiong, Pan Jiexin, Dong Wen, Diao Xiayao, Zhang Ruiyun, Zhang Yonghai, Zhang Yuanfeng, Qian Guang, Chen Hao, Lin Haotian, Xu Shizhong, Chen Zhiwen, Zhou Xiaozhou, Mei Hongbing, Wu Chenglong, Lv Qiang, Yuan Baorui, Chen Zeshi, Liao Wenjian, Yang Xuefan, Chen Haige, Huang Jian, Lin Tianxin. An Artificial Intelligence System for the Detection of Bladder Cancer via Cystoscopy: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab179.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.