Large-scale multi-center CT and MRI segmentation of pancreas with deep learning.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Zheyuan, Keles Elif, Durak Gorkem, Taktak Yavuz, Susladkar Onkar, Gorade Vandan, Jha Debesh, Ormeci Asli C, Medetalibeyoglu Alpay, Yao Lanhong, Wang Bin, Isler Ilkin Sevgi, Peng Linkai, Pan Hongyi, Vendrami Camila Lopes, Bourhani Amir, Velichko Yury, Gong Boqing, Spampinato Concetto, Pyrros Ayis, Tiwari Pallavi, Klatte Derk C F, Engels Megan, Hoogenboom Sanne, Bolan Candice W, Agarunov Emil, Harfouch Nassier, Huang Chenchan, Bruno Marco J, Schoots Ivo, Keswani Rajesh N, Miller Frank H, Gonda Tamas, Yazici Cemal, Tirkes Temel, Turkbey Baris, Wallace Michael B, Bagci Ulas
Аннотация
Automated volumetric segmentation of the pancreas on cross-sectional imaging is needed for diagnosis and follow-up of pancreatic diseases. While CT-based pancreatic segmentation is more established, MRI-based segmentation methods are understudied, largely due to a lack of publicly available datasets, benchmarking research efforts, and domain-specific deep learning methods. In this retrospective study, we collected a large dataset (767 scans from 499 participants) of T1-weighted (T1 W) and T2-weighted (T2 W) abdominal MRI series from five centers between March 2004 and November 2022. We also collected CT scans of 1,350 patients from publicly available sources for benchmarking purposes. We introduced a new pancreas segmentation method, called PanSegNet, combining the strengths of nnUNet and a Transformer network with a new linear attention module enabling volumetric computation. We tested PanSegNet's accuracy in cross-modality (a total of 2,117 scans) and cross-center settings with Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) evaluation metrics. We used Cohen's kappa statistics for intra and inter-rater agreement evaluation and paired t-tests for volume and Dice comparisons, respectively. For segmentation accuracy, we achieved Dice coefficients of 88.3% (±7.2%, at case level) with CT, 85.0% (±7.9%) with T1 W MRI, and 86.3% (±6.4%) with T2 W MRI. There was a high correlation for pancreas volume prediction with R2 of 0.91, 0.84, and 0.85 for CT, T1 W, and T2 W, respectively. We found moderate inter-observer (0.624 and 0.638 for T1 W and T2 W MRI, respectively) and high intra-observer agreement scores. All MRI data is made available at https://osf.io/kysnj/. Our source code is available at https://github.com/NUBagciLab/PaNSegNet.