MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000058501.64655.31

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of plastic surgery · 2003

Use of the scrotal remnant as a tissue-expanding musculocutaneous flap for scrotal reconstruction in Paget's disease.

Por Yong-Chen, Tan Bien-Keem, Hong Soo-Wan, Chia Sing-Joo, Cheng C W S, Foo Chee-Liam, Tan Kok-Chai

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Wide excision of extramammary Paget's disease of the penoscrotal region may leave large defects that cannot be closed easily. The authors describe their experience with a series of 6 patients in whom reconstruction of the scrotal defect was undertaken using the scrotal remnant raised as a stretchable musculocutaneous flap. It was observed that as little as a third of the residual scrotum could be expanded to resurface the entire scrotum. All flaps survived completely. Severe scrotal edema and ecchymosis were observed in 1 patient but the symptoms resolved completely with Trendelenburg positioning. The penile defects were resurfaced individually with thick skin grafts. Good-quality take with no chordee was observed in all patients after initial reconstruction. One patient developed penile contracture after reexcision of recurrent disease. Mean follow-up was 22 months (range, 3-60 months). Large defects of as much as two thirds of the scrotum may be reconstructed successfully using the tissue-expanding scrotal musculocutaneous flap.

Для цитирования: Por Yong-Chen, Tan Bien-Keem, Hong Soo-Wan, Chia Sing-Joo, Cheng C W S, Foo Chee-Liam, Tan Kok-Chai. Use of the scrotal remnant as a tissue-expanding musculocutaneous flap for scrotal reconstruction in Paget's disease.. Annals of plastic surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000058501.64655.31.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.