Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024
Optimized versus conventional trigger threshold for pancreatic phase image acquisition using dual-energy CT at 40-keV: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Noda Yoshifumi, Koyasu Hiromi, Kambadakone Avinash, Kawai Nobuyuki, Naruse Takuya, Ito Akio, Kaga Tetsuro, Hyodo Fuminori, Kato Hiroki, Matsuo Masayuki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of optimized trigger threshold on 40-keV pancreatic phase images acquired with a dual-energy CT (DECT) protocol.
METHODS: A cohort of 69 consecutive participants (median age, 72 years) undergoing a pancreatic protocol DECT examination between September to December 2021 were prospectively randomized into two protocols: conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU (Group A, n = 34) and optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU (Group B, n = 35). Pancreatic phase image acquisition was performed with fixed delay of 20 s from the trigger threshold. Two radiologists assessed the 40-keV pancreatic phase images for scan timing adequacy using a binary scale (adequate or inadequate). The proportions of these classifications were compared in the two groups using the Fisher's test.
RESULTS: The median times to achieve the aortic attenuation of 30 HU and 100 HU were 16.3 s and 22.3 s in Group A, respectively, and was 17.8 s for 30 HU in Group B. The median time difference from 30 HU to 100 HU was 4.5 s in Group A. The scan timing adequacies of pancreatic phase images were classified as adequate (50.0% and 74.3%) or inadequate (50.0% and 25.7%) in Group A and Group B (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: An optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU allows consistent acquisition of adequate pancreatic phase images compared to the conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU for pancreatic protocol DECT at 40-keV which might lead to improved pancreatic lesion conspicuity.
METHODS: A cohort of 69 consecutive participants (median age, 72 years) undergoing a pancreatic protocol DECT examination between September to December 2021 were prospectively randomized into two protocols: conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU (Group A, n = 34) and optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU (Group B, n = 35). Pancreatic phase image acquisition was performed with fixed delay of 20 s from the trigger threshold. Two radiologists assessed the 40-keV pancreatic phase images for scan timing adequacy using a binary scale (adequate or inadequate). The proportions of these classifications were compared in the two groups using the Fisher's test.
RESULTS: The median times to achieve the aortic attenuation of 30 HU and 100 HU were 16.3 s and 22.3 s in Group A, respectively, and was 17.8 s for 30 HU in Group B. The median time difference from 30 HU to 100 HU was 4.5 s in Group A. The scan timing adequacies of pancreatic phase images were classified as adequate (50.0% and 74.3%) or inadequate (50.0% and 25.7%) in Group A and Group B (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: An optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU allows consistent acquisition of adequate pancreatic phase images compared to the conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU for pancreatic protocol DECT at 40-keV which might lead to improved pancreatic lesion conspicuity.