Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2016
Laparoscopic ultrasound procedure can reduce residual myomas in laparoscopic myomectomy for multiple myomas.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mimura Takashi, Hasegawa Junichi, Ishikawa Tetsuya, Sekizawa Akihiko
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To clarify whether the use of laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) during laparoscopic myomectomy could reduce the number of residual myomas after surgery.
METHODS: A cohort study was conducted. Subjects were women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy for multiple uterine myomas for the first time. The subjects were assigned to one of two groups: LUS group or non-LUS group. All subjects underwent pelvic MRI 3 months before and 6 months after surgery, and the number of myomas on MRI was counted by radiodiagnosticians. The extraction rate and residual rate of uterine myomas were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Fourteen cases with and 30 cases without LUS were analyzed. Median operation times were 171 min (range 75-295) and 141 min (range 50-260) in cases with and without LUS, respectively (p = 0.077). Median extraction rates relative to the total number of myomas were 106 % (range 75-147 %) in subjects with LUS and 100 % (range 71-233 %) in subjects without LUS (p = 0.480). Numbers of residual myomas were 1 (range 0-3) in subjects with LUS and 2 (range 0-9) in subjects without LUS (p = 0.028). Median residual rates of myomas were 6.1 % (range 0-20 %) in subjects with LUS and 20.0 % (range 0-69 %) in subjects without LUS (p = 0.048). Myomas greater than 3 cm in diameter were not observed in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The number and residual rate of myomas were significantly less in subjects with LUS as compared with those without LUS.
METHODS: A cohort study was conducted. Subjects were women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy for multiple uterine myomas for the first time. The subjects were assigned to one of two groups: LUS group or non-LUS group. All subjects underwent pelvic MRI 3 months before and 6 months after surgery, and the number of myomas on MRI was counted by radiodiagnosticians. The extraction rate and residual rate of uterine myomas were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Fourteen cases with and 30 cases without LUS were analyzed. Median operation times were 171 min (range 75-295) and 141 min (range 50-260) in cases with and without LUS, respectively (p = 0.077). Median extraction rates relative to the total number of myomas were 106 % (range 75-147 %) in subjects with LUS and 100 % (range 71-233 %) in subjects without LUS (p = 0.480). Numbers of residual myomas were 1 (range 0-3) in subjects with LUS and 2 (range 0-9) in subjects without LUS (p = 0.028). Median residual rates of myomas were 6.1 % (range 0-20 %) in subjects with LUS and 20.0 % (range 0-69 %) in subjects without LUS (p = 0.048). Myomas greater than 3 cm in diameter were not observed in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: The number and residual rate of myomas were significantly less in subjects with LUS as compared with those without LUS.