Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2011
Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gómez-Laencina Ana María, García Cristina Pages, Asensio Laura Villanueva, Ponce Jose Andrés Guijarro, Martínez Monserrat Solera, Martínez-Vizcaíno Vicente
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the comparative value of sonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting the type of delivery after induced labor.
METHODS: The Bishop score was determined by digital examination and cervical length by transvaginal sonography in 177 women.
RESULTS: The best cut-off points for predicting type of delivery found with ROC curves were 25.2 mm for cervical length and 5 for the Bishop score. The Bishop score was not predictive of type of delivery. Cervical length was related to type of delivery in women with Bishop score ≤5. A logistic regression model showed that only cervical length ≥25.2 mm, parity, and body mass index significantly predicted the likelihood of cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that both Bishop score and sonographic cervical length can contribute to predicting type of delivery after labor induction, but cervical length is a better predictor of the risk of cesarean delivery.
METHODS: The Bishop score was determined by digital examination and cervical length by transvaginal sonography in 177 women.
RESULTS: The best cut-off points for predicting type of delivery found with ROC curves were 25.2 mm for cervical length and 5 for the Bishop score. The Bishop score was not predictive of type of delivery. Cervical length was related to type of delivery in women with Bishop score ≤5. A logistic regression model showed that only cervical length ≥25.2 mm, parity, and body mass index significantly predicted the likelihood of cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that both Bishop score and sonographic cervical length can contribute to predicting type of delivery after labor induction, but cervical length is a better predictor of the risk of cesarean delivery.