Cornea · 2023
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Descemet Membrane Reflectivity by Optical Coherence Tomography in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suzuki Takanori, Yamaguchi Takefumi, Yagi-Yaguchi Yukari, Kasamatsu Hirotsugu, Tomida Daisuke, Fukui Masaki, Shimazaki Jun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate Descemet membrane reflectivity using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).
METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 144 eyes of 88 consecutive participants (41 FECD, 15 pseudophakic bullous keratopathies [BKs], and 32 healthy controls, 63.5 ± 16.5 years). FECD was graded 0 to 3 based on the guttae areas using specular microscopy. The sum of AS-OCT reflectivity of the 3-dimensional volume from 10 μm thickness from the endothelial surface of the cornea and residual stromal area was calculated as D sum (endo) and D sum (stroma) in the central area of 3- and 6-mm diameters, respectively. The D ES ratio was defined as the ratio of D sum (endo) to D sum (stroma). The percentage of the guttae area in the specular images was calculated using MATLAB. D sum (endo) and D ES ratio were compared among FECD, BK, and healthy controls.
RESULTS: D sum (endo) in FECD grade 3 was significantly higher than that in healthy control eyes, FECD patients with mild and moderate guttae, and BK (all P ≤ 0.040). The D ES ratio in FECD patients with mild to severe guttae (grade 1-3) was significantly higher than that in healthy control eyes and BK (all P ≤ 0.035). The percentage of the guttae area was significantly correlated with D sum (endo) (R = 0.488, P < 0.001 for 3 mm, R = 0.512, P < 0.001 for 6 mm) and D ES ratio (R = 0.450, P < 0.001 for 3 mm, R = 0.588, P < 0.001 for 6 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane reflectivity in AS-OCT can be objective biomarkers for assessing guttae and FECD severity from early to end-stage FECD.
METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 144 eyes of 88 consecutive participants (41 FECD, 15 pseudophakic bullous keratopathies [BKs], and 32 healthy controls, 63.5 ± 16.5 years). FECD was graded 0 to 3 based on the guttae areas using specular microscopy. The sum of AS-OCT reflectivity of the 3-dimensional volume from 10 μm thickness from the endothelial surface of the cornea and residual stromal area was calculated as D sum (endo) and D sum (stroma) in the central area of 3- and 6-mm diameters, respectively. The D ES ratio was defined as the ratio of D sum (endo) to D sum (stroma). The percentage of the guttae area in the specular images was calculated using MATLAB. D sum (endo) and D ES ratio were compared among FECD, BK, and healthy controls.
RESULTS: D sum (endo) in FECD grade 3 was significantly higher than that in healthy control eyes, FECD patients with mild and moderate guttae, and BK (all P ≤ 0.040). The D ES ratio in FECD patients with mild to severe guttae (grade 1-3) was significantly higher than that in healthy control eyes and BK (all P ≤ 0.035). The percentage of the guttae area was significantly correlated with D sum (endo) (R = 0.488, P < 0.001 for 3 mm, R = 0.512, P < 0.001 for 6 mm) and D ES ratio (R = 0.450, P < 0.001 for 3 mm, R = 0.588, P < 0.001 for 6 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Descemet membrane reflectivity in AS-OCT can be objective biomarkers for assessing guttae and FECD severity from early to end-stage FECD.