MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08820538.2025.2588716

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in ophthalmology · 2025

Evaluating the Endoscopic Jones Primary Dye Test in Lacrimal Dysfunction.

Macri Carmelo Z, Tong Jessica Y, Almater Abdullah I, Selva Dinesh

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the endoscopic Jones (eJones) I and II tests in patients presenting with epiphora.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients assessed for epiphora in a tertiary oculoplastic unit. All patients underwent rigid nasal endoscopy, dacryocystography (DCG), and dacryoscintigraphy (DSG). Lacrimal drainage status was categorized as nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), nasolacrimal duct stenosis (NLDS), or functional epiphora based on imaging findings. eJones I and II test outcomes were compared across diagnostic groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-five symptomatic eyes were included. Functional epiphora was identified in 17 eyes, NLDO in 13 eyes, NLDS in one eye, and four eyes demonstrated normal lacrimal systems. All eyes with NLDO or NLDS had negative eJones I results, while all symptomatic eyes with normal imaging findings had positive eJones I results. Eyes with functional epiphora showed mixed eJones I outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The eJones I test reliably confirmed anatomical obstruction but yielded variable results in cases of functional epiphora, highlighting the multifactorial mechanisms underlying this condition. Further studies are warranted to validate and refine the diagnostic utility of eJones testing.

Для цитирования: Macri Carmelo Z, Tong Jessica Y, Almater Abdullah I, Selva Dinesh. Evaluating the Endoscopic Jones Primary Dye Test in Lacrimal Dysfunction.. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2025.2588716.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.