International ophthalmology · 2020
Sensitivity and specificity of choroidal thickness measurement by EDI-OCT for central serous chorioretinopathy diagnosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Orduña-Azcona Javier, Pérez-Fernández Elia, Guadilla Ana M, De Manuel-Triantafilo Sofía, Modamio Laura, Gili Pablo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of choroidal thickness (CT) measurement by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) diagnosis.
METHODS: Cross-sectional comparative study of 62 consecutive patients: 38 with acute CSC and 24 with macular subretinal fluid from differential diagnoses (DD). Subfoveolar choroidal thickness was measured using EDI 9-mm horizontal protocol. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity and intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Mean subfoveolar CT was greater in CSC group than in DD group (465.45 ± 115.42 μm vs. 347.54 ± 111.27 μm, p < 0.001). The best threshold measure was 390 μm in patients younger than 50 years giving a sensitivity of 89.7% (CI 95%: 73.6-100%) and a specificity of 75% (CI 95%: 40.9-87.3%). For patients older than 50 years best threshold measure was found at 400 μm giving a sensitivity of 45.5% (CI 95%: 21.3-72%) and a specificity of 80% (CI 95%: 58.4-91.9%). Intraclass correlation coefficient for CT measurement was 0.87 (CI 95%: 0.74-0.93).
CONCLUSION: CT measurement with EDI-OCT helps to differentiate CSC from other causes of macular subretinal fluid in patients younger than 50 years.
METHODS: Cross-sectional comparative study of 62 consecutive patients: 38 with acute CSC and 24 with macular subretinal fluid from differential diagnoses (DD). Subfoveolar choroidal thickness was measured using EDI 9-mm horizontal protocol. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity and intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Mean subfoveolar CT was greater in CSC group than in DD group (465.45 ± 115.42 μm vs. 347.54 ± 111.27 μm, p < 0.001). The best threshold measure was 390 μm in patients younger than 50 years giving a sensitivity of 89.7% (CI 95%: 73.6-100%) and a specificity of 75% (CI 95%: 40.9-87.3%). For patients older than 50 years best threshold measure was found at 400 μm giving a sensitivity of 45.5% (CI 95%: 21.3-72%) and a specificity of 80% (CI 95%: 58.4-91.9%). Intraclass correlation coefficient for CT measurement was 0.87 (CI 95%: 0.74-0.93).
CONCLUSION: CT measurement with EDI-OCT helps to differentiate CSC from other causes of macular subretinal fluid in patients younger than 50 years.