Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
An assessment of skill erosion on high-dose rate brachytherapy treatment planning.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
DiCostanzo Dominic J, Allen Theodore T, Ayan Ahmet S, Quick Allison, Evans Kevin D, Patterson Emily S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess skill erosion for physicists after leaving brachytherapy service and contributors to variability during brachytherapy treatment planning.
METHODS: Medical physicists simulated planning for nine patients by creating treatment plans twice, 2 months apart. The physicists were stratified as "On-Service" if they were assigned to and actively participating in the brachytherapy service (including treatment planning) during the study or "Off-Service" if they were not assigned, were not actively engaged in the service, and had not performed treatment planning the 6 months prior to the study commencement or during the study. A mixed effects model with Bonferroni correction was used to test for statistical significance between the stratified groups and Cohen's D was used to compare the effect of skill erosion. ANOVA analysis of a crossed Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility (Gauge R&R) study quantified three contributors to variability for eight segments of the planning process: [1] repeatability (intra-observer), [2] reproducibility (inter-observer), and [3] patient-to-patient variation. Process capability was deemed acceptable when the Total Gauge R&R was less than 10%, marginally acceptable between 10% and 30%, and unacceptable when greater than 30%.
RESULTS: The group of On-Service study participants had lower variability on 10 of 19 measures in the brachytherapy planning process than Off-Service study participants with the effect size being small, Cohen's D between 0.15 and 0.30 for significant measures. This indicates skill erosion does affect physicists after leaving the brachytherapy service for a period of 6 months or more. For both groups, only the bladder D2cc metric had a controlled amount of variability other than applicator reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy treatment planning suffers from skill erosion. Physicists should seek to mitigate its effects and evaluate competency on an ongoing basis.
METHODS: Medical physicists simulated planning for nine patients by creating treatment plans twice, 2 months apart. The physicists were stratified as "On-Service" if they were assigned to and actively participating in the brachytherapy service (including treatment planning) during the study or "Off-Service" if they were not assigned, were not actively engaged in the service, and had not performed treatment planning the 6 months prior to the study commencement or during the study. A mixed effects model with Bonferroni correction was used to test for statistical significance between the stratified groups and Cohen's D was used to compare the effect of skill erosion. ANOVA analysis of a crossed Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility (Gauge R&R) study quantified three contributors to variability for eight segments of the planning process: [1] repeatability (intra-observer), [2] reproducibility (inter-observer), and [3] patient-to-patient variation. Process capability was deemed acceptable when the Total Gauge R&R was less than 10%, marginally acceptable between 10% and 30%, and unacceptable when greater than 30%.
RESULTS: The group of On-Service study participants had lower variability on 10 of 19 measures in the brachytherapy planning process than Off-Service study participants with the effect size being small, Cohen's D between 0.15 and 0.30 for significant measures. This indicates skill erosion does affect physicists after leaving the brachytherapy service for a period of 6 months or more. For both groups, only the bladder D2cc metric had a controlled amount of variability other than applicator reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy treatment planning suffers from skill erosion. Physicists should seek to mitigate its effects and evaluate competency on an ongoing basis.