MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/rct.0000000000000578

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2017

Computed Tomography in the Management of Adrenal Tumors: Does Size Still Matter?

Azoury Saïd C, Nagarajan Neeraja, Young Allen, Mathur Aarti, Prescott Jason D, Fishman Elliot K, Zeiger Martha A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate computed tomography (CT) imaging as a predictor of adrenal tumor pathology.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for an adrenal mass between January 2005 and July 2015. Tumors were classified as benign, indeterminate, or malignant based on preoperative CT findings.

RESULTS

Of 697 patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy, 216 met the inclusion criteria. Pathology was benign in 88.4%, indeterminate in 2.3%, and malignant in 9.3%, with a median tumor diameter of 2.7 cm (interquartile range, 1.7-4.1 cm) and 9.5 cm (interquartile range, 7.1-12 cm) in the benign and malignant groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Of the tumors with benign features on CT, 100% (143/143) had benign final pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging characteristics of adrenal tumors on CT scan predict benign pathology 100% of the time. Regardless of size, when interpreted as benign on CT scan, laparoscopic adrenalectomy, if technically feasible, should be the technique used when surgery is offered, or close surveillance may be a safe alternative.

Для цитирования: Azoury Saïd C, Nagarajan Neeraja, Young Allen, Mathur Aarti, Prescott Jason D, Fishman Elliot K, Zeiger Martha A. Computed Tomography in the Management of Adrenal Tumors: Does Size Still Matter?. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000578.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.