Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021
Review article: distinctions between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease: from physiology to pathology.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pierre Nicolas, Salée Catherine, Vieujean Sophie, Bequet Emeline, Merli Angela-Maria, Siegmund Britta, Meuwis Marie-Alice, Louis Edouard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ileal and colonic Crohn's disease seem to be two separate entities.
AIMS: To describe the main physiological distinctions between the small and the large intestine and to analyse the differences between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease.
METHODS: The relevant literature was critically examined and synthesised.
RESULTS: The small and large intestine have fundamental distinctions (anatomy, cellular populations, immune defence, microbiota). The differences between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease are highlighted by a heterogeneous body of evidence including clinical features (natural history of the disease, efficacy of treatments, and monitoring), epidemiological data (smoking status, age, gender) and biological data (genetics, microbiota, immunity, mesenteric fat). However, the contribution of these factors to disease location remains poorly understood.
CONCLUSION: The classification of ileal and colonic Crohn's disease as distinct subphenotypes is well supported by the literature. Understanding of these differences could be exploited to develop more individualised patient care.
AIMS: To describe the main physiological distinctions between the small and the large intestine and to analyse the differences between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease.
METHODS: The relevant literature was critically examined and synthesised.
RESULTS: The small and large intestine have fundamental distinctions (anatomy, cellular populations, immune defence, microbiota). The differences between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease are highlighted by a heterogeneous body of evidence including clinical features (natural history of the disease, efficacy of treatments, and monitoring), epidemiological data (smoking status, age, gender) and biological data (genetics, microbiota, immunity, mesenteric fat). However, the contribution of these factors to disease location remains poorly understood.
CONCLUSION: The classification of ileal and colonic Crohn's disease as distinct subphenotypes is well supported by the literature. Understanding of these differences could be exploited to develop more individualised patient care.