The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2014
Acquisition of high-level mupirocin resistance in CoNS following nasal decolonization with mupirocin.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hetem David J, Vogely H Charles, Severs Tim T, Troelstra Annet, Kusters Johannes G, Bonten Marc J M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The association between mupirocin use and plasmid-based high-level resistance development mediated through mupA in CoNS has not been quantified. We determined acquisition of mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS in surgery patients treated peri-operatively with mupirocin.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted for surgery were treated with nasal mupirocin ointment and chlorhexidine soap for 5 days, irrespective of S. aureus carrier status. Nasal swabs were obtained before decolonization (T1) and 4 days after surgery (T2) and were inoculated onto agars containing 8 mg/L mupirocin. Staphylococci were identified by MALDI-TOF MS and mupirocin resistance was confirmed by Etest.
RESULTS: Among 1578 surgical patients, 936 (59%) had nasal swabs obtained at T1 and T2; 192 (21%) patients carried mupirocin-resistant CoNS at T1 and 406 (43%) at T2 (P<0.001). Of 744 patients not colonized at T1, 277 acquired resistance (37%), corresponding to an acquisition rate of 7.4/100 patient days at risk. In all, 588 (97%) of 607 mupirocin-resistant CoNS had an MIC >256 mg/L (high level) and 381 of 383 (99.5%) were mupA positive. No acquisition of mupirocin resistance was observed in S. aureus.
CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of mupirocin resistance following decolonization was widespread in CoNS and absent in S. aureus. As almost all isolates harboured the mupA gene, monitoring resistance development in S. aureus when decolonization strategies containing mupirocin are used is recommended.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted for surgery were treated with nasal mupirocin ointment and chlorhexidine soap for 5 days, irrespective of S. aureus carrier status. Nasal swabs were obtained before decolonization (T1) and 4 days after surgery (T2) and were inoculated onto agars containing 8 mg/L mupirocin. Staphylococci were identified by MALDI-TOF MS and mupirocin resistance was confirmed by Etest.
RESULTS: Among 1578 surgical patients, 936 (59%) had nasal swabs obtained at T1 and T2; 192 (21%) patients carried mupirocin-resistant CoNS at T1 and 406 (43%) at T2 (P<0.001). Of 744 patients not colonized at T1, 277 acquired resistance (37%), corresponding to an acquisition rate of 7.4/100 patient days at risk. In all, 588 (97%) of 607 mupirocin-resistant CoNS had an MIC >256 mg/L (high level) and 381 of 383 (99.5%) were mupA positive. No acquisition of mupirocin resistance was observed in S. aureus.
CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of mupirocin resistance following decolonization was widespread in CoNS and absent in S. aureus. As almost all isolates harboured the mupA gene, monitoring resistance development in S. aureus when decolonization strategies containing mupirocin are used is recommended.