Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola · 2016
Ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media: Surgical results and prognostic factors of surgical success.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Castro Sousa Ana, Henriques Vânia, Rodrigues Jorge, Fonseca Rui
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The goal of ossiculoplasty is to improve hearing. Successful ossiculoplasty depends on several factors. This retrospective study was carried out to analyze hearing results of ossiculoplasty in ears with chronic otitis media (COM) and evaluate clinical outcomes and factors predictive of hearing improvement.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the results of 153 patients with COM (with cholesteatoma (COMC) and without cholesteatoma (COMWC)) who underwent ossiculoplasty between January of 2002 to December of 2011. Several potential prognostic factors were evaluated: cholesteatoma present vs absent; type of surgical procedure, state of the middle ear mucosa, state of the ossicular chain, type of prosthesis.
RESULTS: We analyzed 153 ossiculoplasties: 96 patients presented COMWC and 57 patients presented COMC. The ossiculoplasties were performed using autologous ossicles for the most part. All ossiculoplasties were carried out in one-stage surgery. In 38% of cases ossiculoplasty was combined with mastoidectomy; in the remaining 62% of cases, ossiculoplasty was performed without mastoidectomy. Ossiculoplasty was successfully achieved in 113 patients (74%). The presence of the stapes superstructure and normal mucosa were significant predictive factors of surgical success.
CONCLUSION: The majority of the ossiculoplasties improved hearing status satisfactorily. Multivariate analysis should be performed to investigate prognostic factors of favorable short-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty. Better knowledge of these predictive factors may contribute to the surgeon's judgment and the information given to patients.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the results of 153 patients with COM (with cholesteatoma (COMC) and without cholesteatoma (COMWC)) who underwent ossiculoplasty between January of 2002 to December of 2011. Several potential prognostic factors were evaluated: cholesteatoma present vs absent; type of surgical procedure, state of the middle ear mucosa, state of the ossicular chain, type of prosthesis.
RESULTS: We analyzed 153 ossiculoplasties: 96 patients presented COMWC and 57 patients presented COMC. The ossiculoplasties were performed using autologous ossicles for the most part. All ossiculoplasties were carried out in one-stage surgery. In 38% of cases ossiculoplasty was combined with mastoidectomy; in the remaining 62% of cases, ossiculoplasty was performed without mastoidectomy. Ossiculoplasty was successfully achieved in 113 patients (74%). The presence of the stapes superstructure and normal mucosa were significant predictive factors of surgical success.
CONCLUSION: The majority of the ossiculoplasties improved hearing status satisfactorily. Multivariate analysis should be performed to investigate prognostic factors of favorable short-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty. Better knowledge of these predictive factors may contribute to the surgeon's judgment and the information given to patients.