Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 1988
Comparison of glottic areas measured by acoustic reflections vs. computerized tomography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
D'Urzo A D, Rubinstein I, Lawson V G, Vassal K P, Rebuck A S, Slutsky A S, Hoffstein V
Аннотация
We compared measurements of glottic area obtained by acoustic reflection technique with anatomically equivalent area measured from computerized tomographic (CT) scans of the neck in 11 subjects with glottic pathology. Both measurements were performed in the supine position during tidal breathing at functional residual capacity. We found excellent agreement in glottic areas obtained by both methods: the mean (+/- SD) values were 1.8 +/- 0.8 cm2 for the acoustic method and 1.7 +/- 0.9 cm2 for the CT method. Linear regression analysis revealed the following relationship between the area measured by acoustic technique (AAC) and that measured by CT (ACT): AAC = 0.81.ACT + 0.36. There was a significant correlation between the two measurements of glottic area (r = 0.95, P less than 0.0001). We conclude that the acoustic reflection technique may be used reliably in clinical and physiological studies concerned with glottic geometry.