Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2023
Is All-on-four effective in case of partial mandibular resection? A 3D finite element study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dario Vangi, Michelangelo-Santo Gulino, Roberto Branchi, Fabio Ferretti
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the work is to analyze stress distribution on 3D Finite Element (FE) models at bone, implant, and framework level of different designs for fixed implant-supported prostheses in completely edentulous patients, comparing results on whole and partially resected mandibles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D anisotropic FE models of a whole and of a partially resected mandible were created using a TC scan of a cadaver's totally edentulous mandible. Two types of totally implant-supported rehabilitation were simulated, with four implants: parallel fixtures on whole mandible and on resected mandible, All-on-four-configured fixtures on whole mandible and on partially resected mandible. A superstructure comprising only metal components of a prosthetic framework were added, while stress distribution and its maximum values were analyzed at bone, implant, and superstructure level.
RESULTS: The results highlight that: (1) implant stresses are greater on the whole mandible than on the resected one; (2) framework and cancellous-bone stresses are comparable in all cases; (3) on the resected mandible, maximum stress levels at the cortical-bone/implant interface are higher than in whole-mandible rehabilitation. The opposite applies for maximum stresses on external cortical bone, measured radially with respect to the implant from the point of maximum stress at the interface.
DISCUSSION: On the resected mandible, All-on-four configuration proved biomechanically superior to parallel implants considering radial stresses on implants and cortical bone. Still, maximum stresses increase at the bone/implant interface. A design with four parallel implants minimizes the stress on a resected mandible while, on the whole mandible, the All-on-four rehabilitation proves superior at all levels (bone, implant, and framework).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D anisotropic FE models of a whole and of a partially resected mandible were created using a TC scan of a cadaver's totally edentulous mandible. Two types of totally implant-supported rehabilitation were simulated, with four implants: parallel fixtures on whole mandible and on resected mandible, All-on-four-configured fixtures on whole mandible and on partially resected mandible. A superstructure comprising only metal components of a prosthetic framework were added, while stress distribution and its maximum values were analyzed at bone, implant, and superstructure level.
RESULTS: The results highlight that: (1) implant stresses are greater on the whole mandible than on the resected one; (2) framework and cancellous-bone stresses are comparable in all cases; (3) on the resected mandible, maximum stress levels at the cortical-bone/implant interface are higher than in whole-mandible rehabilitation. The opposite applies for maximum stresses on external cortical bone, measured radially with respect to the implant from the point of maximum stress at the interface.
DISCUSSION: On the resected mandible, All-on-four configuration proved biomechanically superior to parallel implants considering radial stresses on implants and cortical bone. Still, maximum stresses increase at the bone/implant interface. A design with four parallel implants minimizes the stress on a resected mandible while, on the whole mandible, the All-on-four rehabilitation proves superior at all levels (bone, implant, and framework).