Archives of oral biology · 2023
An automated landmark method to describe geometric changes in the human mandible during growth.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fournier G, Maret D, Telmon N, Savall F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The principal aim of this study was to assess an automatic landmarking approach to human mandibles based on the atlas method. The secondary aim was to identify the areas of greatest variation in the mandibles of middle-aged to older adults.
DESIGN: Our sample consisted of 160 mandibles from computed tomography scans of 80 men and 80 women aged between 40 and 79 years. Eleven anatomical landmarks were placed manually on mandibles. The automated landmarking through point cloud alignment and correspondence (ALPACA) method implemented in 3D Slicer was used to automatically place landmarks to all meshes. Euclidean distances, normalized centroid size, and Procrustes ANOVA were calculated for both methods. A pseudo-landmarks approach was followed using ALPACA to identify areas of changes among our sample.
RESULTS: The ALPACA method showed significant differences in Euclidean distances for all landmarks compared to the manual method. A mean Euclidean distance of 1.7 mm was found for the ALPACA method and 0.99 mm for the manual method. Both methods found that sex, age, and size had a significant effect on mandibular shape. The greatest variations were observed in the condyle, ramus, and symphysis regions.
CONCLUSION: The results obtained using the ALPACA method are acceptable and promising. This approach can automatically place landmarks with an average accuracy of less than 2 mm, which may be sufficient in most anthropometric analyses. In the light of our results, however, odontological application such as occlusal analysis is not recommended.
DESIGN: Our sample consisted of 160 mandibles from computed tomography scans of 80 men and 80 women aged between 40 and 79 years. Eleven anatomical landmarks were placed manually on mandibles. The automated landmarking through point cloud alignment and correspondence (ALPACA) method implemented in 3D Slicer was used to automatically place landmarks to all meshes. Euclidean distances, normalized centroid size, and Procrustes ANOVA were calculated for both methods. A pseudo-landmarks approach was followed using ALPACA to identify areas of changes among our sample.
RESULTS: The ALPACA method showed significant differences in Euclidean distances for all landmarks compared to the manual method. A mean Euclidean distance of 1.7 mm was found for the ALPACA method and 0.99 mm for the manual method. Both methods found that sex, age, and size had a significant effect on mandibular shape. The greatest variations were observed in the condyle, ramus, and symphysis regions.
CONCLUSION: The results obtained using the ALPACA method are acceptable and promising. This approach can automatically place landmarks with an average accuracy of less than 2 mm, which may be sufficient in most anthropometric analyses. In the light of our results, however, odontological application such as occlusal analysis is not recommended.